WHO BROUGHT ENEMY PROPERTY (
VALIDATION AND AMENDMENT ) ACT 2010 FOR GIVING VALIDATION TO USURP HINDUS LAND
ACQUIRED BY THEM AFTER PARTITION, THEY ARE AHMAD PATEL ADVISOR TO SANIA MANIP
OF TURIN CHARGE SHEETED BY CBI FOR STEALING 34 ANTIQUES, COMMITTED MURDER OF
LAL BAHADUR THROGH MOTHE MANIO W/O STEFENO, NEHRU WAS GRAND SON OF GYASSUDDIN
GAZI , INDIRA GANDHI WAS MAMUNA BEGUM AND MARRIED TO FIROZ KHAN NOT GANDHI AND
RAJIV BORN BEFORE 9 MONTHS AND THAN FROM MOHHAMAD YUNUS AND GAVE BIRTH TO
SANJAY GANDHI . THESE WERE WOLF IN HIDDEN SHEEP . ENEMY PROPERTY ACT WAS
PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED, SALMAN KHURSHEED, GULAB NAVI, FAROKH ABDULLAH AZARUUDDIN,
AND ALL MUSLIMS UNION MINISTER JOINED TO ISSUE DEATHE WARRANT UPON HINDUS BY
ACT OF BETRAYAL. WHO FLOURISHES MADARASA IN REPORT BY JUSTICE SACHCHAR COMMISSION AND IN REPORT JUSTICE RANG NATH MISHRA REPORT ,
INDIAN WAKF ACT ,TAJ MAHAL , KUTUB MINAR < FATEHPUR SIKIRI AGRA FORT HIMAYUN
MAKBARA, DHAI DIN KA JHOPDA< AJMER SAREEF ARE ALL SUBSERVED HINDUS
MONUMENTS, WHO IS KEEPING THEM SUMERGED I.E
INDIAN MONUMENTS PRESERVATION AND
PROTECTION ACT 1904 IN ARCHEOLOGICAL ACT 1951 AND 1958 RULES to Sub Serve
PURPOSE AS THEY MAY CALL . HINDUS AS INFIDELS
WHY NAWAZ ON MID WAY TO TERRORISED HINDUS , HAJJ SUBSDY, HALAL ZAKAT
KALMA AND OF COWS IN BHARAT. YES THESE ARE HIDDEN WOLF WHO RAPPED DAMINI ALIAS
JYOTI SINGH PADEY AND CUT DOWN SOLDIERS HEAD THROUGH TALIBAN PROMOTION AND
MESDEMOISELLES OUR ARMY WAKE UP INDIAN . IT IS TIME FOR MAHABHARATA IN
BHARAT
Eighteen months after the controversial Batla
House 'encounter'in the aftermath of the Delhi serial blasts, the post-mortem
reports of the victims are out and are drilling gaping holes in the police
version of the incident. The post-mortem reports reveal that both the slain
suspected terrorists, Atif Ameen and Mohd Sajid, had injuries inflicted by a blunt
object, other than the numerous gunshot wounds on their bodies. Sajid's
post-mortem report also confirms he was shot three times in the head with the
bullets travelling vertically downwards, which was visible in the photographs
of Sajid's .The report says these three bullets having their entry wounds in
the scalp led to cranio-cerebral damage to the brain, causing Sajid's eath. One
of these bullets fired in the head exited from the back of his chest, another
came out near his jaw and the third one exited from the
back of his right shoulder. There was another bullet shot behind his head. How the police managed to shoot Sajid from above during an encounter remains unexplained. The report also confirms that Sajid has another bullet entry wound on his right shoulder, which went vertically down and lodged in his chest. There were two more injuries on Sajid's body, which are non-firearm
wounds. How these wounds could be inflicted when bullets were being fired from both sides, according to the police version, remains unanswered. These are injury numbers 13 and 14 specified in the post-mortem report - the former is a four by two cm abrasion over the midline on Sajid's back while the latter is a muscle-deep laceration wound of 3.5 by two cm on the right leg. It is unexplained how Sajid could have got such wounds before his death in a shootout. The post-mortem report of Atif reveals his body was riddled with 10 bullets in the chest, abdomen, thighs, shoulder, neck and lower back. He also has a nonfirearm injury - specified as injury number seven
which is an abrasion on his right knee. The post-mortem reports have been furnished by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in response to an application filed under the
Right to Information (RTI) Act by a Jamia Millia Islamia student Afroz Alam. The Delhi Police had persistently refused to share these reports over the last 18 months. Even the NHRC had skirted the issue initially in their report on the Batla House encounter though it went to great lengths to explain the fire-arm injuries to Delhi Police inspector Mohan Chand Sharma that caused his death.
The NHRC, in its report, had merely said that the post-mortem reports of the two suspected terrorists mentioned injuries other than fire-arm injuries but did not disclose more or investigate how injuries by a blunt object could have been inflicted in a shootout. The autopsies of Atif and Sajid were done three days after the encounter by a panel of three AIIMS doctors of forensic medicine. The autopsy reports reveal what the Delhi Police have been desperately trying to hide.
"Blunt injuries mentioned in the autopsy could not have been caused in a shootout. Obviously, there was some scuffle or the two boys were beaten up before they were shot. How can anyone explain the top of the head bullet injuries or the one in the top of his (Sajid) right shoulder - with all bullets going vertically down in the body?" .He added: "Pictures of the bodies had exposed these injuries. The police were hence desperately trying to hide these post-mortem reports. The non-firearm injuries on both the back and leg of Sajid cannot be explained. That is why we have been demanding an independent investigation into the alleged encounter." A senior doctor at AIIMS, who was associated with the autopsies, said he could not explain the nonfirearm injuries on Sajid's body. "But the other three or four gunshot wounds on Sajid's head and shoulder is possible in a shootout… for example, the terrorist may have fallen after taking a bullet in his leg and could have been firing at the police lying down. So, such a pattern of injuries is possible in such a volley of fire," yogesh saxena advocate rubbished the explanation. "If Sajid was lying down and firing, there should be a hail of police bullet marks on the walls of the room. But there was none in the room where the shootout happened," he said. The Jamia Teachers Solidarity Association also reacted strongly to the contents of the autopsies. "Almost all entry wounds on Atif's body are in the region below the shoulders and at the back of the chest, which point to the fact that he was repeatedly shot from behind. In Sajid's case, the entry points of the gunshots and the fact that all but one bullet travelled downward suggests he was held down by force (which
also explain the injuries on the back and leg), while he was shot in the back and head," With extradition of Pakistani- American David Coleman Headley now ruled out after he pleaded guilty to terror charges mayalso be seen with the angle that government of Indiaisa terrorist state.
back of his right shoulder. There was another bullet shot behind his head. How the police managed to shoot Sajid from above during an encounter remains unexplained. The report also confirms that Sajid has another bullet entry wound on his right shoulder, which went vertically down and lodged in his chest. There were two more injuries on Sajid's body, which are non-firearm
wounds. How these wounds could be inflicted when bullets were being fired from both sides, according to the police version, remains unanswered. These are injury numbers 13 and 14 specified in the post-mortem report - the former is a four by two cm abrasion over the midline on Sajid's back while the latter is a muscle-deep laceration wound of 3.5 by two cm on the right leg. It is unexplained how Sajid could have got such wounds before his death in a shootout. The post-mortem report of Atif reveals his body was riddled with 10 bullets in the chest, abdomen, thighs, shoulder, neck and lower back. He also has a nonfirearm injury - specified as injury number seven
which is an abrasion on his right knee. The post-mortem reports have been furnished by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in response to an application filed under the
Right to Information (RTI) Act by a Jamia Millia Islamia student Afroz Alam. The Delhi Police had persistently refused to share these reports over the last 18 months. Even the NHRC had skirted the issue initially in their report on the Batla House encounter though it went to great lengths to explain the fire-arm injuries to Delhi Police inspector Mohan Chand Sharma that caused his death.
The NHRC, in its report, had merely said that the post-mortem reports of the two suspected terrorists mentioned injuries other than fire-arm injuries but did not disclose more or investigate how injuries by a blunt object could have been inflicted in a shootout. The autopsies of Atif and Sajid were done three days after the encounter by a panel of three AIIMS doctors of forensic medicine. The autopsy reports reveal what the Delhi Police have been desperately trying to hide.
"Blunt injuries mentioned in the autopsy could not have been caused in a shootout. Obviously, there was some scuffle or the two boys were beaten up before they were shot. How can anyone explain the top of the head bullet injuries or the one in the top of his (Sajid) right shoulder - with all bullets going vertically down in the body?" .He added: "Pictures of the bodies had exposed these injuries. The police were hence desperately trying to hide these post-mortem reports. The non-firearm injuries on both the back and leg of Sajid cannot be explained. That is why we have been demanding an independent investigation into the alleged encounter." A senior doctor at AIIMS, who was associated with the autopsies, said he could not explain the nonfirearm injuries on Sajid's body. "But the other three or four gunshot wounds on Sajid's head and shoulder is possible in a shootout… for example, the terrorist may have fallen after taking a bullet in his leg and could have been firing at the police lying down. So, such a pattern of injuries is possible in such a volley of fire," yogesh saxena advocate rubbished the explanation. "If Sajid was lying down and firing, there should be a hail of police bullet marks on the walls of the room. But there was none in the room where the shootout happened," he said. The Jamia Teachers Solidarity Association also reacted strongly to the contents of the autopsies. "Almost all entry wounds on Atif's body are in the region below the shoulders and at the back of the chest, which point to the fact that he was repeatedly shot from behind. In Sajid's case, the entry points of the gunshots and the fact that all but one bullet travelled downward suggests he was held down by force (which
also explain the injuries on the back and leg), while he was shot in the back and head," With extradition of Pakistani- American David Coleman Headley now ruled out after he pleaded guilty to terror charges mayalso be seen with the angle that government of Indiaisa terrorist state.
No comments:
Post a Comment