Al Qaeda and other
structured jihadi organizations are concerned over this phenomenon because if
this trend continues, it could affect the flow of volunteers and funds to their
organisations. It is said that many angry Muslims in the non-tribal areas
and in the diaspora no longer flock to these organisations to volunteer their
services for suicide terrorism. Instead, they rush to the nearest
Internet Cafe to learn how to be a suicide bomber, gang up with a small number
of like-minded persons, pool their savings, buy material which could be
converted into explosives and embark on their suicide missions.
For these Made-in-the-Internet suicide bombers, the cyber world has become a virtual Ummah and everyone of them looks upon himself as a bin Laden or as an Amir fighting for the cause of his religion.
Concern over this development has been openly expressed by Maulana Masood Azhar, the Amir of the Jaish-e-Mohammad (JEM) of Pakistan, in an article in "Al Qalam", a publication of the JEM, written before the Pakistani Army raid into the Lal Masjid of Islamabad in July, 2007. He said: "Now, there are hundreds of jihadi outfits and hundreds of Amirs. Most of these Amirs are computer operators, who have become jihadis by watching CDs of jihad. They have received jihadi training through websites. They think that via the Internet, they have become Amirs. If they come across a gullible youth, they tie a bomb around his body and send him to jihadi battlefields. Some of the jihadis are in the business of drugs, human smuggling and kidnapping for ransom. Jihad has become everybody's business. Now, it is difficult to control these jihadis."
However, unlike the JEM, Al Qaeda's reaction to this phenomenon has been more nuanced. It does not claim responsibility for these individual attacks, but at the same time, it does not discourage them. It has been trying to give the impression that it is still in total control of the global jihad and that whatever has been happening in the world in the form of jihadi attacks----whether by individuals not belonging to any organisation or by those belonging to Al Qaeda and other organisations---- is in pursuance of its global jihadi strategy. The stepping-up of its propaganda offensive and dire warnings since the beginning of 2007 are part of its strategy of creating an impression that it continues to be in total control of the jihad.
For these Made-in-the-Internet suicide bombers, the cyber world has become a virtual Ummah and everyone of them looks upon himself as a bin Laden or as an Amir fighting for the cause of his religion.
Concern over this development has been openly expressed by Maulana Masood Azhar, the Amir of the Jaish-e-Mohammad (JEM) of Pakistan, in an article in "Al Qalam", a publication of the JEM, written before the Pakistani Army raid into the Lal Masjid of Islamabad in July, 2007. He said: "Now, there are hundreds of jihadi outfits and hundreds of Amirs. Most of these Amirs are computer operators, who have become jihadis by watching CDs of jihad. They have received jihadi training through websites. They think that via the Internet, they have become Amirs. If they come across a gullible youth, they tie a bomb around his body and send him to jihadi battlefields. Some of the jihadis are in the business of drugs, human smuggling and kidnapping for ransom. Jihad has become everybody's business. Now, it is difficult to control these jihadis."
However, unlike the JEM, Al Qaeda's reaction to this phenomenon has been more nuanced. It does not claim responsibility for these individual attacks, but at the same time, it does not discourage them. It has been trying to give the impression that it is still in total control of the global jihad and that whatever has been happening in the world in the form of jihadi attacks----whether by individuals not belonging to any organisation or by those belonging to Al Qaeda and other organisations---- is in pursuance of its global jihadi strategy. The stepping-up of its propaganda offensive and dire warnings since the beginning of 2007 are part of its strategy of creating an impression that it continues to be in total control of the jihad.
Abdul Rahman Antulay, Union Minister for Minority
Affairs, who is an Islamic leader and Congress politician from Maharashtra, is
one of the most important pro-Jihadi in the Sonia lead Congress government in
New Delhi. Antulay is not merely the bridge between Sonia and Islamic mafia,
but he is also the progenitor of the underworld Islamic mafia in Mumbai. Under
his regime in Mumbai, the notorious Islamic mass murderer and mafia don Dawood
Ibrahim was able to establish his criminal empire.
Abdul Rahman Antulay made an erroneous and accusatory statement in Parliament that Hindu activists may be responsible for the murder of Maharashtra ATS Chief Hemant Karkare. His false accusation of innocent Hindus, the victims of Jihadi terrorism is utterly without merit. His diversionary tactic is a deliberate attempt to mentally misdirect the gullible public from the colossal failure of the Sonia government. The baseless allegation simply is attributed to save inept, corrupt and indifferent Congress ministers. Equally misleading is his malicious attempt to depict peace loving Hindus as the chief architects of the Jihadi massacre in Mumbai.
Antulay is a point man for Sonia to hoodwink the public. His malicious statement is a psychological ploy to cover up the Congress government’s dereliction of responsibilities and misconduct in safe guarding life and liberty of citizens. Like an apocalyptic Islamic terrorist, Antulay is suffering from a peculiar malignant Islamic madness. His accusatory statement is, in fact, an attempt to avoid recognition of the darkness and Islamic hatred within him. The portrayal of Hindus as wild animals destroying lives is sheer Islamic Al-Taquiea. With this false diversionary ploy, the Antulay Islamic gang is systematically undermining India’s ability to defend itself against Islamic terrorists.
Antulay’s Islamic political double game is nothing new. During his administration in Maharashtra, he encouraged pro-criminal Islamic values and endorsed Islamic smugglers, and Jihadi mafia gang in Mumbai.
It is a crime to blame the victims and Jihadi terrorism. It is doubly sinful to accuse the Hindu victims as perpetrators of Islamic terrorism. He has been engaged in treason, slander and high crimes and misdemeanors for a long time with impunity. Antulay is a traitor, a Jihadi double agent, an enemy of our country.
It is unfortunate that citizens are willing to surrender India’s national interest to opportunistic Islamic double agents in the name of tolerance and coexistence.
The health of our country can be gauged by the degree to which we reject these bloody Islamic apostles of terror. Acceptance of such traitors is perhaps the most profound indicator of our country’s crisis and decay. The proper response is to identify such traitors as our enemies and confront them accordingly.
Abdul Rahman Antulay made an erroneous and accusatory statement in Parliament that Hindu activists may be responsible for the murder of Maharashtra ATS Chief Hemant Karkare. His false accusation of innocent Hindus, the victims of Jihadi terrorism is utterly without merit. His diversionary tactic is a deliberate attempt to mentally misdirect the gullible public from the colossal failure of the Sonia government. The baseless allegation simply is attributed to save inept, corrupt and indifferent Congress ministers. Equally misleading is his malicious attempt to depict peace loving Hindus as the chief architects of the Jihadi massacre in Mumbai.
Antulay is a point man for Sonia to hoodwink the public. His malicious statement is a psychological ploy to cover up the Congress government’s dereliction of responsibilities and misconduct in safe guarding life and liberty of citizens. Like an apocalyptic Islamic terrorist, Antulay is suffering from a peculiar malignant Islamic madness. His accusatory statement is, in fact, an attempt to avoid recognition of the darkness and Islamic hatred within him. The portrayal of Hindus as wild animals destroying lives is sheer Islamic Al-Taquiea. With this false diversionary ploy, the Antulay Islamic gang is systematically undermining India’s ability to defend itself against Islamic terrorists.
Antulay’s Islamic political double game is nothing new. During his administration in Maharashtra, he encouraged pro-criminal Islamic values and endorsed Islamic smugglers, and Jihadi mafia gang in Mumbai.
It is a crime to blame the victims and Jihadi terrorism. It is doubly sinful to accuse the Hindu victims as perpetrators of Islamic terrorism. He has been engaged in treason, slander and high crimes and misdemeanors for a long time with impunity. Antulay is a traitor, a Jihadi double agent, an enemy of our country.
It is unfortunate that citizens are willing to surrender India’s national interest to opportunistic Islamic double agents in the name of tolerance and coexistence.
The health of our country can be gauged by the degree to which we reject these bloody Islamic apostles of terror. Acceptance of such traitors is perhaps the most profound indicator of our country’s crisis and decay. The proper response is to identify such traitors as our enemies and confront them accordingly.
Courtesy
by -
Yogesh Kumar Saxena, Advocate, High Court, Allahabad,Ex. Vice President,
Advocate’s Association, Chamber No. 139,High Court, Trained Mediator of the first batch of
Mediation Team, Registration No. 946 of
1974 ( U.P.Bar Council of Allahabad),Special Counsel in Ganga Pollution Matter. Executive Member, World
Parliament Experiment (Bonn) Germany 22nd Feb. 7th March
2008, Yoga superior studies &meditation science technique, 4215 NW 7 Street,
#34, Miami, FL33126 , International conferences of Chief Justices of the World
, (Co Coordinators and Co- Organizers) at City Montessori School, Lucknow
, yogrekha@gmail.com,
yogrekha@rediffmail.com,
0532-2637720, 2436451, 9415284843, 9792131584,
No comments:
Post a Comment