Our Thrust for civilization has been
conversed to the religion of violence
This is on account of facts that we do not
respect each others and are divided in segmentations.
Justice Rajendra Sachar Report is
the warrant of Slavery. There is no concession in the Name of a Religion in
our preamble of constitution. The basic
Structure of Constitution Prohibits it and Article 14 and 16 restricts any such
type of reservation on caste basis. Smt. Sonia Gandhi Is disqualified to becom
the member of parliament. Indira Gandhi was a
Muslim as Firoz Khan alias GANDHI S/O Nawab Khan Of Junagarh was. The Gandhi
And Nehru Dynasty Were Anti Muslims. Rajeev Gandhi Was Roman Chatholic namely
Rajeev Rabortro and the name of Rahul Gandhi Is RAUL ROBORTO an d PRIYANKA name
is actually vaintika Roborto who married in same caste as
Disclosed from The Writing and Articles written by Sri A. Ghose supplement By Great Nationalist Shri R.V.Bhasin
of Bombay Mow Mumbai , Who after retirement is a practicing Advocate Of Bombay
High Court and Hon’ble Supreme Court.
1. That the present representation is filed in
the terms of section 95 Cr.P.C. read-with Sections 153-A and 295-A of I.P.C.,
wherein a public duty is casted upon the Central Government and State Govt. to
forfeit every copy of Koran, also spelled as ‘Quran’. The so called religious
book of the Muslims the world-over, which insides violence, disturbs public
tranquility promotion, on the grounds the religion, a feeling of enmity and
ill-will between different religious communities and thereby insults other
religions and religious belief of other communities in the secular of India.
2. That for the convenient perusal the section
95 of Cr.P.C. and the provisions of section 153-A and 295-A of I.P.C. are
reproduced as under :-
i. “95, Power of declare certain publications
forfeited and to issue search-warrants for the same—(1) where-
b. any newspaper, or book, or
c. any document,
i. wherever printed, appears to the State
Government to certain any matter the publication of which is punishable under
Section 124-A or Section 153-A or section 153-B or section 295-A of the Indian
Penal Code ( 45 of 1860), the State Government may, by notification, stating
the grounds of the opinion, declare every copy of the issue of the newspaper
containing such matter, and every copy of such book or other document to be
forfeited to Government, and thereupon any police officer may seize the same
whenever found in India and any Magistrate may by warrant authorize any police
officer not below the rank of sub-inspector to enter upon and search for the
same in any premises where any copy of such search for the same in any premises
where any copy of such issue or any such book or other document may be or may
be reasonably suspected to be.
ii. (2) In this section and in section 96-
d. “newspaper” and “book” have the same meaning
as in the Press and Registration of Books Act, 1867 (25 of 1867);
e. “document” includes any painting, drawing or
photograph, or other visible representation.
i. (3) No order passed or action taken under
this section shall be called in question in any Court otherwise than in
accordance with the provisions of Section 96.”
f. “153-A.
Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race,
place of birth, residences, language, etc. and doing acts prejudicial to
maintenance of harmony.- (1) wherever-
3. by words, either spoken or written, or by
signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to
promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language,
caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or feelings of
enmity, hatred or ill-will between different religious, racial, language or
regional groups or castes or communities , or
4. commits any act which is prejudicial to the
maintenance of harmony between different religious, racial, language or
regional groups or castes or communities, and which disturbs or is likely to
disturb the public tranquility.
5. Organizes any exercise, movement, drill or
other similar activity intending that the participants in such activity shall
use or be trained to use criminal force or violence or knowing it to be likely
that the participants in such activity will use or be trained to use criminal
force or violence, or participates in such activity intending to use or be
trained to use criminal force or violence or knowing to it be likely that of
participants in such activity will use or be trained to use criminal force or
violence, against any religious, racial, language or regional group or caste or community and such activity, for any
reason whatsoever causes or is likely to cause fear or alarm or a feeling of
insecurity amongst members of such religious, racial, language or regional
groups or caste or community,
a. Shall be punished with imprisonment which
may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.
i. Offence committed in place of worship, etc.-
(2) Wherever commits an offence specified in sub-section (1) in any place of
worship or in any assembly engaged in the performance of religious worship or
religious ceremonies, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to
five years and shall also be liable to fine.”
b. “295-A. Deliberate and malicious
acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its
religious beliefs – wherever, with deliberate and malicious intention of
outraging the religious feelings of any class of citizens of India, by words,
either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or
otherwise, insults or attempts to insult the religion or the religious beliefs
of that class, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a
term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.”
6. That although according to the Islamic belief, Koran ( Quran ) is
regarded as a divine book containing the words revealed by prophet Mohammad.
The verses of Quran were in relations to the happening taken place during the
particular events and the connotation of it has a different and separate back
grounds , than the present scenario based upon the logical perceptions and that
of intellectual property rights.
7. That in the society, wherein the Rule of Law
is supreme, the perceptions of authenticity is based upon the truthfulment of
the statements and the orthodox superstitions with the ideological
confrontation be wiped out in collaboration with harmony between other sections
of the society.
8. That the Muslims in India have seldom
invited their own people for the public discussions of their creed in general.
The effect of the preaching made by their prophet and most of them have
idolized the verses of Quran at par with their religion. The result of such
pressure being exerted by vociferous activities upon rest of citizens in case
one may convince to have the introspection of the repercussions of such
preaching which ultimately lead its followers and act of terrorism.
9. That such activities have been broadened to
include the memberships, support, assistance or furthering the activities of
some terrorists’ organizations. The raising of funds intended for the purposes
of ‘Terrorist Act’ has always provided an enumerable loss to the life and
property of the people worshiping the other religion than Islam. Thus in a
secular estate such activities of terror may provide a considerable loss to
national assessed by declining in the terrorist participation in promotion of
the financial assessed to out nation.
10. That the petitioner is seeking the direction
from the Central Government to declare such preaching of ‘ZIHAD’ for converting
out nation as DARUL-E-ISLAM by the recital of verses of Quran as detrimental to
the interest of the nation.
11. That the citizens having following of the
other religion of Hinduism, Buddhist and Jainism including Jews, who are
regarded to be “infidels” at the hands of “believer” of Quran, have their right
to know in respect of their fault being committed by them on account of their
non-violent and peaceful a domination of every religion. Thus there is no moral
and spiritual import except by a free and fourth right discussion and the
interpretation of verses of Quran in its rights prospectives to the followers
of the Islam.
12. That a citizen who is properly informed
regarding the public opinion can only decide in the long run, as to whether the
Quran qualifies or not as a religion scripture.
13. That by the mere reading of a few sayings of
Quran – 37 which proclaims “ Preach cruelty, incite violence and disturbs”
public peace, while verse –17 saying which “ Promote on ground of religion,
feeling of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities
in India”. The 31 saying further proclaim, “ Insult other religious as also the
religious belief of other communities.
14. That secular pattern in behaviour of Muslim
majority in Bangladesh and Pakistan towards the Hindu minority simply
demonstrates the cruelty and feelings of hatred amongst the fellow citizens in
keeping with the tenets of Islam.
15. That it is submitted that recent photos of
Bangladesh Hindus, who have been systematically uprooted from their ancestral
home land, even after India had made great sacrifice for speculating liberation
for Bangladesh are mesirable, which is apparent from perusal of photographs of
Mass-killing and gang-rapes conducted in Bangladesh. The copies of photographs
published in ------------ having naked bodies of women lying slaughtered and
victims of rape, gang-rapes in the family of the Hindus minority at Bangladesh
and the treatment given to the personnel of Border Security Forces are filed
herewith as Annexure no.1.
16. That on one hand the Hindus, Buddhist,
Jainism stood for non-violence, truthfulness, non-stealing, chastity and
non-covetousness, while the preaching of Quran may puzzle them the adherents of
another religion of Islam based upon the cruelty, violence and crime. Thus the
concept of secularism as adhered by our nation has become antithesis with the
acts of terrorism and recital of preaching from Quran.
17. That the similar issues were raised in the
matter of writ application no. 297 of 1985 in the constitutional writ
jurisdiction at Calcutta, wherein there was recital of the ‘SURAH &
AYATEN’, which are reproduced as Annexre No. 1
18. That it was submitted that communal strife
and conflicts in its orthodoxy may be seen at Pakistan whose sizable number of
Hindu population has been obliterated through murder or through forcible
conversion. However, in the judgement passed by then Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vimal
Chandra Basak on 17th May, 1985 had observed that making such order
as prayed for would amount to abolition of Muslim religion.
19. That the problem is now aggravated by the
facts that unlike other communities, Muslim are highly orthodox people and
follow the sayings of Quran with fanatical zeal as a result of which even the
sizable number of Muslim population can never have been peace on the soil of
our nation.
20. That even the Muslim Act founded by
Baha’iulah in Iran in 19th Century, whose 1 Millions followers are
living in India for spiritual unity, which is uncomphertable with Quranic
preaching has been subjected to verse prosecution and the students have been
expelled from school and colleges in Iran. In Shia nation and Sunni nation are
themselves indulged in violent conflict resulting in numerous death. Thus a
modified version of Surah and Ayat in the preset context of communal harmony is
required to be given to its followers if the majority of the citizens are save
themselves for the vast communal passions and religion fanaticism.
21. That the judgement given in Chanda Mal
Chopra and another Vs. State of West Bengal was based upon the wrong premises
that section 295-A does not penalize any and every act of insult or attempt to
insult the religion or religious belief of class of citizen, which are not
perpetrated with deliberate and malicious intention of religious feelings of
that class. It was observed by the Hon’ble Court that in its opinion it cannot
be said that Quran offers any insult to any other religion.
22. That the preamble of our constitution and
Article 25 and 26 of our Constitution are providing freedom of conscience.
23. That the preamble proclaimed India to be
secular states. However, it has been wrongly interpreted that offending Surah
and Ayate of Quran if being forfeited from its publication and the recital may deprive a section of people
of their right of thought expression, belief, faith and worship, such action
would amount to abolition of Muslim religion. This has been a wrong findings
which are totally inconsistent with the offended verses of its Surah and Ayat
as reproduced above.
24. That the application of section 153-A is
squarely applicable for forfeiture and banning of the offending Surah and Ayat
enumerated in the Quran as the same generates disharmony feeling of enmity and
hatred and also the ill-will between different religion or community.
25. That it was observed in the aforesaid
judgement of Chopra case, while delivering the judgement by Hon’ble Mr. Justice
Basak that no untoward incident has been reported till then for carrying on the
mutual enmity, hatred between section of the Muslim minority and Hindu Majority
incite violence as main aim and object of Quran.
26. That the petitioner most respectable submits
that a lot of the terrorist activities have been sur-phased by the followers of
the Islam mainly on account of preaching given in Quran, which has lead to the
violence of Bombay Blast case of 1993 by Daud Ibrahim and Saleem, Ankaleshwar
Temple blast, Killing the parliamentary attack, 11th September Tower
Attack in America, series of bomb blast inside the railways compartments in
Mumbai, Sankatmochan Mandir blast and complete elimination of members of other
communities for territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Godara blast are the
evidence to demonstrate that the decision given by Justice Basak has not taken
any probability of the happening mentioned above and as such the present writ
petition requires to look into the facts of mass-acre and atrocities committed
upon the innocent Hindu citizens. It is submitted that as the last word of
prophet written in Quran the Muslims are
not ready even to enter in argument or discussion while on the other hand there
has been recent judgement of Supreme Court of Malaysia discouraging the bearing
of turban by the students, which was adopted on account of being warn by
prophet Mohammad. The true photo copy of the judgement passed by three judges
bench of Malaysia Court is being filed herewith as Annexure no. 2 .
27. That the sources of Islam or Quran and
Hadis, called as Sullah, the Quran contains the prophet “rebulation”., while
Hadis are al that prophet Mohammad did or said or enjoyed, forbade or did not
forbid approved or dis-approved. The Quran is Hadis-mutawatir i.e. the
tradition considered authentic and genuine by all Muslims from beginning. The
interpretation used by its followers even in changed context of the present
days scientific invention and in the light of 2 nuclear bomb invasions in two
other centuries is not correct interpretation, which could have been said to be
last word of prophet Mohammad as if prophet Mohammad would have been surviving
today he would have not promoted Zihad in way of prayer of Allah, nor “
infidel” so called Hindus would have been burned or slaughtered in such a
manner as the followers of Islam have started practicing in the name of Quran.
28. That the vary revelation of the word Islam
from which the Muslim has been formed, the same drives from “ AS-LAM’ meaning
solution to other and peace. Thus the meaning of infidel does not mean the
fellow of other religion, but those who does not believe in any God and have indulged
in the ruthless killing of animals and other fellow citizens, the true
perceptions of the correct proposition of Surah and Ayat may be understood by
healthy discussions in the matter. Thus every Hindu citizen has got the right
to know the meaning of the infidel and status of Zimmis on which the Zaziya or
capitation tax, was realised by the force of arms during period of slavery
under the Mughals sub-ordination,
29. That there is another aspect of the matter
regarding the creation of quite painting by M.F. Hussain proclaiming himself to
he follower of Islam. In the aforesaid paintings which have published and may be seen by any Hindu citizen, there
has been naked goddess Durga and goddess Saraswati, Lord Rama without his head
and naked Goddess Sita sitting on the thee of Raman and also on the tail of
Hanuman. Goddess Durgaji has been shown to the in coupling with the tiger,
while goddess Parwati is shown in the union with the Elephant, while Lord Shiva
is said to have been watching upon them. Can it be assumed that M.F. Hussain is
a cynic or infidel, who is suffering from seizophrenia with the sadistic
pleasure by assailing the sentiments of Hindu citizen of our country. The naked
photographs of our goddess demonstrated in oil painting by M.F. Hussain are
filed as Annexure no.2.
30. That on one hand the Hindu is considered to
be tolerant for whom the misrepresentation is given to be co-ordis by the Muslims, if the Hindus may start
their counter aggressism by preparing the suicidal Bomber upon Zama-Maszid and
other mosque, the repercussion may be much serious resulting in the situation
of riote Orson and Dona side. Thus in order to provide a curve upon such
happening judicial review is required to be done regarding the interpretation
of offending Surah and offending Ayate of Quran as the same may not be
misunderstood by its followers.
31. That the example of counter aggression has
been seen at Iraq wherein Saddam has been executed by the American in his own
country. It is submitted that there may be vested interest of other nations who
remained opportunist to rule India on the policy of divide and rule amongst its
citizens. Thus the ------given by Britishers for interpreting the Surah and
Ayate of Quran is neither beneficial for our nation, nor the same is beneficial
for Pakistan and Bangladesh to demonstrate their displeasure on the question of
revaluation of truth amongst our fellow citizens.
32. That it has been brought to the notice of
the Most of citizens that N.D.P.S. is used for providing the illusionary
atmosphere of Zannat for preparing suicide bombers. It has been found that the
individual under going through brain-drain through such illusionary perception
was smiling just before few seconds of the blast. Thus the conclusion is
in-escapable that the preaching of Quran to its followers by some time generate
themselves the illusionary perceptions of providing the attainment to the
heaven if they voluntary sacrifice their life in the name of Zihad as Allah
ordered them for killng of infidels. Thus the judicial activism is required to
be done for positive interpretation of such recital, otherwise slaughtering and
thereby plundering of innocent people may lead to the counter aggression, which
is not congenial for the development of a Nation.
33. That Mahatma Gandhi in December, 1927 in
face of violent Muslim Mobs pointed out towards its psychology from which
Hindus have yet free themselves---------
34. That Mahatma Gandhi ---------
35. That in this manner Quran may never be
regarded as the holy book, nor the Muslim religion based upon misconception of
Zihad and Darul-E-Islam may never be able to get the generation in the mind of
Hindus. The slogan of secularism and Sarvadharm Sambhawa, it is submitted that
the individual Afzal who attached upon the Parliament has yet not been hanged
under the guise of getting the protection as a repercussion of such hanging may
not lead to the mob violence, which was seen during the period, when the
cartoon of Mohammad was made in the remote country at Denmark.
36. That it is true that Hindus have fought
Muslim invaders, who had locally established the Muslim dynasties. However our
previous rulers have neglected to study the religious and ideological motives
of such invaders and speculation remained unmindful of new phenomenon in their
midst. Thus scullery dissertation of disciples of great learning may
demonstrate the awareness-------
37. That the problem of Muslim phenatics who are
the followers of offending Surah and Ayate of Quran by generating the concept
of Zihad and Darul-e-Islam is further magnified from the event of having the
parliament attack. It is submitted that on one hand there is psychological fear
generated in the mind of people from such attack and Godhara killing, but when
in retaliation of act of terrorism, the counter aggressism was adopted by Hindu
citizens in State of Gujrat then the entire word including appeasement policy
of Government could not muster the courage of depreciating the Godhara killing,
but the retrial after the acquittal of innocent citizens was further ordered to
have been taken place in different State of Maharastra.
38. That it is threatening of mob violence under
the appeasement policy that despite the death sentence awarded to Afzal for his
heinous offence of sedition through attack on Parliament, the Government of
India could not provide the execution of death sentence. It is submitted that
Chief Minister of Jammu Kashmir Sri Ghulam Navi Azad have warned the Central
Govt. restraining from execution of Afzal and the entire cabinet decision have
yet not the taken courage to hand the culprit of parliamentarian attack under
the garb of pendency of mercy petition before his excellency the President of
India. Thus the policy enumerated in regard to such pattern-age granted to the
invaders indulged in terrorist attack may only be reduced if the Hon’ble Court
being sentinel and guardian of majority of population may grant the
proclamation and forfeiture of offending Surah and Ayate written in Quran to
rightful conclusion through judicial interpretation.
No comments:
Post a Comment