what is the purpose of Pope ( INVOLVED IN PERVERSE SEX SCANDALS WITH ORPHANS HANDICAPPED CHILDREN IN VATICAN CITY) coming to India?

The perception of the Media in recent days of secularism has been a subject of debate. Media rushing to paint the recently killed terrorist girl as innocent is of latest Memory. A letter appearing in VIJ. Karnataka Bangalore edition Dt. 16-7-04 is sent for information. Media Jehadi bhai-bhai I congratulate you for publishing the brilliant and courageous article by Dina Nath Mishra (VT July 6) which clearly bares the unholy nexus between the English media and the terrorist-jehadi movement on our sacred soil. The English media in the past quarter century has been carrying on a nefarious campaign against the Hindu leaders on the one hand and our security forces on the other. Masquerading as secular champions the English media has clandestinely joined hands with pan-Islamic radicals and fake secularists in demoralizing and demeaning the noble and patriotic intentions of our law-enforcing machinery. The outburst of the English media in he aftermath of the recent Ahmedabad encounter is the latest in the list.By now, it must be clear to one and all that the Jehadi-terrorist movement in India, emanating from Pakistani soil, is out to eliminate many Hindu leaders with a well-knit propaganda cover provided by the English media in the name of secularism, freedom of the press and human rights. More than two decades ago, during the Meerut and Moradabad communal riots, the law-enforcing machinery was criticised by the English media for having put down the rioters with an iron hand. There were loud demands from self-styled secularists, Leftists and the English media to disband the UP provincial armed constabulary, accusing the police of being highly communal for having shown the lawless elements the place they deserve. A systematic campaign to demoralize our security forces including the Army has since been unleashed by the English media with the active support of the secularists and Leftist politicians. The guardian of law is sought to be projected as he arch villain from the days of the Merrut/Moradabad riots to the post-Godhra carnage.
A cursory glance at the conduct of the English media in our country form the days of the freedom struggle would reveal its spineless character when it never dared to displease but preferred to appease the British rulers. During the Emergency, the English press acted as the steno-typist of the Press Information Bureau of the then Government. L K Advani gave a fitting certificate by declaring that the press chose to crawl when asked to bendb. The English press has never upheld the dignity of professional journalism. On the other hand, the newspapers have been converted into propaganda sheets. After the Emergency, the English media has chosen to become a champion of pseudo-secularism through its indiscriminate disinformation campaigns to undermine the prospects of the Jan Sangh, BJP etc. Now the cat is out of the bag. That the electronic media is hand in glove with jehadi supporters and sympathisers is palpable.
It is now for the readers to decide whether this Secularist-Jehadi-Media axis is posing a grave threat to our national security.We at Hindu Uprising are a group of educated indians who wish to preserve Hindu heritage, save india from pseudosecularists and remove politicians like M.s Sonia Maino (syn Antonia Maino , syn Sonia Gandhi) from controlling and devastation our country. Today it has been a few months since UPA came to power, Prices have been rising Industry confidence is low BSE underwent the single largest fall when this govt was formed, in fact the circuit breaker was put up twice:(
Trukers srike cost Indian Economy a lot but the FM wasnt bothered? Think of how many export orders cancelled, lost faith of Importers of indian goods. And also books are being changed to suit leftists, People like Sikh gurus are being demeaned in History books.  Top of it criminals control the worlds largest railway network, its contracts and will try to siphon its money. Mr Laloo Prasad Is a criminal, (chargesheeted by the court) and so are many ministers in the Manmohan Govt. Mr Manmohan lacks guts to stand up, he blind follows the actual prime minister.  So We decided to give our voice also the the ongoing protests. We invite articles for this blog on these issues. We will also keep a close watch on current affairs and keep you updated hindu uprising.  We hope to discredit Ms Sonia by letting everyone know about her roots, telling lies about her education, her sister selling Indian antiques , and her anti Indian designs

We have traced the history of India and its struggle for independence to show how the concept of minority developed prior to and at the time of framing of Constitution and later in the course of its working, History tells us that there were certain religious communities in India who were required to be given full assurance of protection of their religious and cultural rights. India is a country of people with the largest number of religions and languages living together and forming a Nation.  Such diversity of religions, culture and way of life is not to be found in any part of the world.  John Stuart Mill described India as "a world placed at closed quarters".  India is a world in miniature. The group of Articles 25 to 30 of the Constitution, as the historical background of partition of India shows, was only to give a guarantee of security to the identified minorities and thus to maintain integrity of the country.  It was not in contemplation of the framers of the Constitution to add to the list of religious minorities.  The Constitution through all its organs is committed to protect religious, cultural and educational rights of all. Articles 25 to 30 guarantee cultural and religious freedoms to both majority and minority groups.  Ideal of a democratic society, which has adopted right of equality as its fundamental creed, should be elimination of majority and minority and so-called forward and backward classes.  Constitution has accepted one common citizenship for every Indian regardless of his religion, language, culture or faith.  The only birth in India.  We have to develop such enlightened citizenship where each citizen of whatever religion or language is more concerned about his duties and responsibilities to protect rights of the other group than asserting his own rights.  The constitutional goal is to develop citizenship in which everyone enjoys full fundamental freedoms of religion, faith and worship and no one is apprehensive of encroachment of his rights by others in minority or majority.
Muslim community started claiming as religious minority only just before independence.  Islam came in India in 712 A.D. through foreign invaders.  First  invasion was made by Mohd. Bin Qasim and thereafter a series of invasions were made by Mohd. Gajni and Mohd. Gori etc.  Mohd. Bin Qasim established Islamic Rule in Sindh and Multan in 712 A.D.  After Mohd. Gori, Mohd. Qutubbuddin Aibak, Akram Shah, Altmus, Gyasuddin Blaban, Razia Sultan, Jalaluddin Khilji, Alauddin Khilji, Firoz Shah Tughlak, IbrahimmLodhi and other Sultans ruled India and thereafter Babar established Moghul rule in 1526 followed  Humaun, Akbar, Jahangir, Shahjahan, Aurangjeb and other Moghul rulers and lastly by Bahadur Shah Zafar in greater India.  Indian society other than Muslim minority was ruled by Muslim Rulers for about one thousand years over most parts of India.   For all these years Indian society other than Muslim minority was subjected to pay Jezia Tax in most parts of India to remain as Hindus and to perform their cultural and religious rites.
Relevant Paragraphs at page 50 of a  Book 'Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India (Vol. III: Medieval Indian Society and Culture) by J.L. Mehta is relevant in the present context, the same is being reproduced below:-
"Mohd. Bin Qasim, who laid the foundation of the Muslim Rule in Sindh and Multan (711-12), secured the status of Zimmis for his hindu subjects from the caliph and accorded protection to their lives and property on the receipt of jaziya.  Obviously, this step was necessitated as a matter of political expediency because in spite of the loss of independence, the hindu masses, in general offered odgged resistence to forced conversions.  It was physically impossible for Qasim and handful of his Arab followers to compel the vanquished multitude 'to choose between Islam and death', particularly, when they were 'armed to the teeth'.  Recognition of hindu 'idolators' of Arabia.  His example was followed by the turkaofghan rulers of Delhi in their dealings with the hindus.  The latter were not treated as full-fledged citizens of 'the Islamic stte' albeit they received status of zimmis-'the second-class' or 'inferior'  citizens, which denied them all political rights and made them suffer from certain socio=religious and economic disabilities so as 'to prevent them from growing strong.  In the words of Jadu Nath Sarkar,
"The very term zimmi is an insulting title.  It connotes political inferiority and helplessness like the status of a minor proprietor, perpetually under a guardian; such protected people could not claim equality with the citizens of the Muslim theocracy."
There developed, with the passage of time, four schools of though for the authoritative interpretation of shara or 'the Islamic law'; these were known as Malakite, Shafite, Hanbalite and Hanafite after the names of their founders-Malik Ibn Anas (715-95 A.D.), Ash-Shafi (767-820), Ahmad Bin Hanbal (780-855) and Abu Hanifah (699-766), Doctors of the first three schools offered no other alternative but death to 'the idolators' including the hindus, on their refusal to embrace Islam.  It were the exponents of the Hanifah school alone who permitted their existence in the Islamic state as zimmis.  That explains the intesne hatred of the non-muslims by the orthodox muslims fanatics, in general; whenever a muslim ruler fell under the spell of such orthodox ulema, he adopted the policy of religious intolerance and persecution of his hindu subjects.  It created a permanent gulf between the hindus and muslims which could not be bridged effectively for a long time.  According to an observation, 'the politcal and religious condition under which the hindus were forced to live in a muslim state raised a great barrier between the two communities.  The political supremacy of muslims was absolute; the hindus not only enjoyed no political status in practice, but could not even aspire to it under Islamic theory'.  While living in their own country and in possession of their own hearths and homes, the hindus were reduced to the status of inferior citizens of 'an Islamic state' as the sultanate of Delhi was usually styled.  On the other hand, the muslims, though in microscopic minority, constituted the privileged or the most favoured children of the state who enjoyed the bounties and benefited from all the public welfare and other state enterprises."
Relevant paragraph at page 42 of the   Book 'Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India (Vol. III: Medieval Indian Society and Culture) by J.L. Mehta is also relevant, the same is being quoted below:-
"Thus, Islam does not separate religion from politics; in fact, the concept of religion in Islam emerged first, the state was 'an after-thought'.  The additional Islamic law does not acknowledge 'the independent existence of state, nor is state regarded as a primary condition of human society.  It makes the State completely subservient to the religion of the Prophet.  According to the Islamic law, the state is only an instrument to serve the creed in the attainment of its objectives or fulfilment of ideals of the muslim brotherhood.  The Islamic theory of state was, therefore, based on a three fold idea of one scripture, one sovereign and one nation; scriptu was the hly Quran, sovereign was the imam (leader), also called Khalifa (the caliph)- political successor to the Prophet, and nation was the millat-the muslim brotherhood.  The basic feature of the state, according to this theory, was its 'indivisibility'  in all the three aspects.  It contemplated the establishment of a theocratic state based on the Islamic law, and recommended only one sovereign, the caliph, to rule over the whole of the muslim world.  The caliph was styled as the amir ul momnin-'the leader of the faithful'; his office was thus a political institution based on Islamic injunctions.  The sovereignty resided in the millat which elected their imam or the caliph, and the latter was under religious obligation to implement the Islamic law on and for the benefit of his muslim subjects.  The Islamic government was, therefore, one which was composed of the muslims, by the muslims and existed for the happiness and welfare of the muslims alone."
This paragraph has references of Books such as Arnol J Toynbee, A Study of History: 12 vols; OUP, 4th impression, 1948, IV, p. 230, Wolseley Haig, CHI,III, p.-10, A.B.M. Habibullah, Foundation of Muslim Rule in India; Allahabad, 2nd ed; 1961, p.2., Toynbee, Study of History, pp.clt; VI, p. 285,  Toynbee, Study of History, pp.clt; IV, p. 98,  Toynbee, Study of History, pp.clt; VI, pp.98-100,  Toynbee, Study of History, pp.clt; VI, p.5,129, 131-132, 245-60. It is strange that Sonia Maino Gandhi says she wants to serve India. She should take a lesson from Menaka Gandhi, who is serving India without personal gains. Who is stopping Sonia from working with poor sections of society or donating her money to blind and orphans of India? Sonia does not have to be the Prime Minister of India to serve India.
Also, what is the purpose of Pope ( INVOLVED IN PERVERSE SEX SCANDALS WITH ORPHANS HANDICAPPED CHILDREN IN VATICAN CITY)  coming to India? Is it a Christian conspiracy to support Congress which has proved to be a party of opportunists? I fully agree with Professor Rajinder Singh that Pope should respect all faiths if he himself wants to be respected in India. In fact, Christianity could learn from Hinduism which says "all paths lead to God". We Hindus never say that "ours is the only way", and it shows the wisdom of Hindus. Sonia and her foreign origin need to be fully taken into consideration before putting our trust in her. The future of India has to be in Indian hands, not Italian hands. God Bless India!