Sita Ram Goel
We shall now take
up the explanation provided by the theology of Islam derived from the Quran
and the Hadis.
Ibn Ishaq, the
first biographer of the Prophet, devotes many pages to a description of
Arab polytheism at the time when Islam started taking shape. Every
Arab household, he tells us, had an idol of some God or Goddess.
He also gives the names of many idols which were housed in sanctuaries
maintained by different tribes across the Arab peninsula. The Ka‘ba
at Mecca which housed 360 idols was only one of these sanctuaries, though
it was the most prestigious. One of the idols in the Ka’ba was named
Allah. Though it had some primacy over other idols, it was far from
being an exclusive deity. Besides, there were many sacred groves
and places of pilgrimage visited by Arabs on special occasions.
At the same time,
Ibn Ishaq informs us that Monotheism was becoming an attractive creed among
some sections of the Arab elite. It was the creed of the Roman, Iranian
and Abyssinian empires which inspired awe and admiration among the Arabs
at that time. Many Jews and Christians were present, individually
or in communities, in the more important Arab towns. These People
of the Book took great pride in their worship of the one and only God and
looked down upon the Arabs who had had no Prophet, who possessed no Book
and who worshipped stones and stocks. They aroused a sense of inferiority
in the minds of those Arabs who came in close contact with them but who
were not equipped with an alternate theology that could defend their own
Gods and Goddesses. Such Arabs looked forward to the day when Arabia
also would have a Prophet and a Book of its own.
Those who have
compared the Bible and the Quran know how close the two are in spirit and
language on the subject of idols and idol-worshippers. Like Jehovah
of the Bible, Allah also advances his claim to be the one and only God.
He denounces the mushriks (idolaters) as the doubly damned category
of kafirs (unbelievers) when compared to the other category, the
People of the Book. The idols, proclaims Allah while abrogating the
so-called Satanic Verses, are mere names invented by the ancestors of the
Arabs. They have neither eyes nor ears nor hands nor feet and can,
therefore, neither help nor harm. They cannot respond to prayers
and will fail to save their worshippers from bell on the Day of Judgement.
They will themselves burn in the fire of hell together with those who worship
them. Meanwhile, they render their worshippers napak (abominable)
in the eyes of Allah.
In the early days
of Islam, Muslims were too weak to practice iconoclasm at Mecca.
They had to rest content with expressing their contempt for idols.
Food which had first been offered to idols was spurned. Names which
referred to some pagan God or Goddess were changed as soon as the bearers
entered the fold of Islam. But the clarion call had come. “Herd
them together,” said Allah, “those who commit transgression and those whom
they worship, and start them on the road to hellfire” (Quran, 37.22-23).
The Prophet saw Amr bin Lubayy “dragging his intestines in Fire.” Amr was
a second century king, supposed to have brought idols from Syria and set
them up in Arabia.
Medina where Muslims
were stronger witnessed some acts of iconoclasm even before the Prophet
migrated to that city. Ibn Ishaq tells us how the idol of Amr Ibnul-Jamuh
was stolen at night by a group of Muslims and thrown into a cesspit, again
and again till Amr lost faith in it and became a Muslim. At nearby
Quba, Sahl broke up the idols of his tribe at night and took the pieces
to a Muslim woman who used them as fuel.
The Prophet made
iconoclasm a pious performance for all Muslims for all time to come when
he practised it himself on the very day he conquered Mecca. “When
the Prophet,” writes Ibn Ishaq, “prayed the noon prayer on the day of the
conquest he ordered that all the idols which were round the Ka‘ba should
be collected and burnt with fire and broken up.” Citing some other sources,
the Encyclopaedia of Islam says, “Muhammad
when he entered Mecca as victor is stated to have struck them in the eyes
with the end of his bow before he had them dragged down and destroyed by
fire.” Pictorial representations of Ali standing on the shoulders of the
Prophet and tearing down the idol of Hubal from top of a Ka‘ba wall, have
been published by Shias.1
Soon after, expeditions
were sent to other parts of Arabia for doing what had been done at Mecca.
Idols were smashed and temples destroyed or converted into mosques everywhere,
Muslim poets vied with each other to record the events in rapturous verse.
Fazal bin al-Mulawwih sang:
Had you seen Muhammad and his troops,And Kab bin Malik:
The day the idols were smashed when he entered,
You would have seen God’s light become manifest,
In darkness covering the face of idolatry.
We foresook al-Lat, al-Uzza and WuddAnd al-Mustaughir Bin Rabia who was a warrior as well as a poet:
We stripped off their necklaces and earrings.
I smashed Ruda so completely that
I left it a black ruin in a hollow.
“Growing Islam,”
concludes the Encyclopaedia of Islam, “was from the very beginning
intent upon the destruction of all traces of pagan idolatry and was so
successful that the anti-quarians of the second and third century of the
Hadira could glean only very scanty details. Some of the idols were
made use of for other purposes, as for example, the idol Dhul-Kalasa… which
was worshipped at Tabala, a place on the road from Mekka to Yaman in the
time of Ibn al-Kalbi (about 200 A.D.), was used as a stepping stone under
the door of the mosque at Tabala. Other stones which had been worshipped
as idols were actually used as corner-stones of the Ka‘ba.”
Muslim
historians tell us on the authority of the Prophet that idolaters of Arabia
had set up idols in places which were meant to be mosques when they were
established for the first time by Abraham. The mosque of Ka‘ba, we
are told, had been built by Abraham at the very centre of the earth.2
Those who dismiss Rama as mythological gossip and deny him a place of birth
at Ayodhya may well enquire whether Abraham was a historical person who
actually presided over the building of the Ka‘ba.
It is, however,
recorded history that the armies of Islam did everywhere what had been
done in Arabia, as they advanced into Iran, Khorasan, Transoxiana, Seistan,
Afghanistan and India. Hundreds of thousands of Fire Temples of the
Zoroastrians, Buddhist monasteries and Hindu temples disappeared or yielded
place to mosques, ziarats and dargahs. Modern archaeology, has reconstructed
what happened along the trail of Islamic invasion of all these ancient
lands.
Maulana Minhaj-us-Siraj,
the thirteenth century historian, sums up the theology of Islam vis-a-vis
idols and idol-temples when he comes to Mahmud of Ghazni in his Tabqat-i-Nasiri.
“He was endowed,” he writes, “with great virtues and vast abilities; and
the same predominant star was in the ascendant at his birth as appeared
at the dawn of Islam itself. When Sultan Mahmud ascended the throne
of sovereignty his illustrious deeds became manifest unto all mankind within
the pale of Islam when he converted so many thousands of idol-temples into
masjids and captured many of the cities of Hindustan… He led an army to
Naharwala of Gujarat, and brought away Manat, the idol from Somnath, and
had it broken into four parts, one of which was cast before the centre
of the great masjid at Ghaznin, the second before the gateway of the Sultan’s
palace, and the third and fourth were sent to Makkah and Madinah respectively.”
Mahmud’s coins struck at Lahore in the seventh year of his reign describe
him as the “right hand of the Caliph” and “the breaker of idols.”
This is the simple
and straightforward explanation of why Islamic invaders desecrated the
idols of Hindu Gods and Goddesses, destroyed Hindu temples and converted
them into mosques. It covers all facts, completely and consistently,
and leaves no loopholes.
Indian Express, May 21, 1989
Footnotes:
1
When Muhammad entered the Ka‘ba after his conquest of Mecca by overwhelming
force, he declared, “Truth has come and falsehood has vanished” (Sahih
Muslim, 4397). Ram Swarup comments, “It takes more than an invading
army or crusaders or a demolition squad with sledge-hammers to establish
the domain of Truth… Similarly, it is not that easy to get over ‘falsehood’…
True spiritual demolition involves the demolition of desire-gods and ego-gods,
the demolition of the false gods that reside in conceited theologies, in
pretentious revelations and fond belief…” (Understanding Islam Through
Hadis, Voice of India, Second Reprint, 1987, Pp. 115-16.)
2
The Prophet of Islam gave not only a new, ‘religion’ to his country-men
but also a new history of Arabia, the same as the prophets of Secularism
have been doing in India since the days of Pandit Nehru’s dominance.
No comments:
Post a Comment