Sita Ram Goel
The mention made
by Maulana Abdul Hai (Indian Express, February 5) of Hindu temples
turned into mosques, is only the tip of an iceberg, The iceberg itself
lies submerged in the writings of medieval Muslim historians, accounts
of foreign travellers and the reports of the Archaeological Survey of India.
A hue and cry has been raised in the name of secularism and national integration
whenever the iceberg has chanced to surface, inspite of hectic efforts
to keep it suppressed. Marxist politicians masquerading as historians
have been the major contributors to this conspiracy of silence.
Muslim politicians
and scholars in present-day India resent any reference whatsoever to the
destruction of Hindu temples in medieval times. They react as if
it is a canard being spread by those they stigmatise as Hindu communalists.
There was, however, a time, not so long ago, when their predecessors viewed
the same performance as an act of piety and proclaimed it with considerable
pride in inscriptions and literary compositions. Hindus of medieval
India hardly wrote any history of what happened to their places of worship
at the hands of Islamic iconoclasts. Whatever evidence the “Hindu
communalists” cite in this context comes entirely from Islamic sources,
epigraphic and literary.
There are many
mosques all over India which are known to local tradition and the Archaeological
Survey of India as built on the site of and, quite frequently, from the
materials of, demolished Hindu temples. Most of them carry inscriptions
invoking Allah and the Prophet, quoting the Quran and giving details of
when, how and by whom they were constructed. The inscriptions have
been deciphered and connected to their historical context by learned Muslim
epigraphists. They have been published by the, Archaeological Survey
of India in its Epigraphia Indica-Arabic and Persian Supplement,
an annual which appeared first in 1907-08 as Epigraphia Indo-Moslemica.
The following few inscriptions have been selected in order to show that
(1) destruction of Hindu temples continued throughout the period of Muslim
domination; (2) it covered all parts of India-east, west, north and south;
and (3) all Muslim dynasties, imperial and provincial, participated in
the “pious performance.”
1. Quwwat al-Islam
Masjid, Qutb Minar, Delhi: “This fort was conquered and the Jami Masjid
built in the year 587 by the Amir… the slave of the Sultan, may Allalh
strengthen his helpers. The materials of 27 idol temples, on each
of which 2,000,000 Delhiwals had been spent were used in the (construction
of) the mosque…” (1909-10, Pp 3-4). The Amir was Qutbud-Din Aibak,
slave of Muizzud-Din Muhammad Ghori. The year 587 H. corresponds to 1192
A.D. “Delhiwal” was a high-denomination coin current at that time in Delhi.
2. Masjid at
Manvi in the Raichur District of Karnataka: “Praise be to Allah that
by the decree of the Parvardigar, a mosque has been converted out of a
temple as a sign of religion in the reign of… the Sultan who is the asylum
of Faith … Firuz Shah Bahmani who is the cause of exuberant spring in the
garden of religion” (1962, Pp. 56-57). The inscription mentions the
year 1406-07 A.D. as the time of construction.
3. Jami Masjid
at Malan, Palanpur Taluka, Banaskantha District of Gujarat: “The Jami
Masjid was built… by Khan-I-Azam Ulugh Khan... who suppressed the wretched
infidels. He eradicated the idolatrous houses and mine of infidelity,
along with the idols… with the edge of the sword, and made ready this edifice…
He made its walls and doors out of the idols; the back of every stone became
the place for prostration of the believer” (1963, Pp. 26-29). The
date of construction is mentioned as 1462 A.D. in the reign of Mahmud Shah
I (Begada) of Gujarat.
4. Hammam Darwaza
Masjid at Jaunpur in Uttar Pradesh: “Thanks that by the guidance of
the Everlasting and the Living (Allah), this house of infidelity became
the niche of prayer. As a reward for that, the Generous Lord constructed
an abode for the builder in paradise” (1969, p. 375). Its chronogram
yields the year 1567 A.D. in the reign of Akbar, the Great Mughal.
A local historian, Fasihud-Din, tells us that the temple had been built
earlier by Diwan Lachhman Das, an official of the Mughal government.
5. Jami Masjid
at Ghoda in the Poona District of Maharashtra: “O Allah! 0 Muhammad!
O Ali! When Mir Muhammad Zaman made up his mind, he opened the door
of prosperity on himself by his own hand. He demolished thirty-three
idol temples (and) by divine grace laid the foundation of a building in
this abode of perdition” (1933-34, p.24). The inscription is dated 1586
A.D. when the Poona region was ruled by the Nizam Shahi sultans of Ahmadnagar.
6. Gachinala
Masjid at Cumbum in the Kurnool District of Andhra Pradesh: “He is
Allah, may he be glorified… During the august rule of… Muhammad Shah, there
was a well-established idol-house in Kuhmum… Muhammad Salih who prospers
in the rectitude of the affairs of Faith… razed to the ground, the edifice
of the idol-house and broke the idols in a manly fashion. He constructed
on its site a suitable mosque, towering above the buildings of all” (1959-60,
Pp. 64-66). The date of construction is mentioned as 1729-30 A.D.
in the reign of the Mughal Emperor Muhammad Shah.
Though sites of
demolished Hindu temples were mostly used for building mosques and idgahs,
temple materials were often used in other Muslim monuments as well.
Archaeologists have discovered such materials, architectural as well as
sculptural, in quite a few forts, palaces, maqbaras, sufi khanqahs,
madrasas, etc. In Srinagar, Kashmir, temple materials can be
seen in long stretches of the stone embankments on both sides of the Jhelum.
Two inscriptions on the walls of the Gopi Talav, a stepped well at Surat,
tell us that the well was constructed by Haidar Quli, the Mughal governor
of Gujarat, in 1718 A.D. in the reign of Farrukh Siyar. One of them
says, “its bricks were taken from an idol temple.” The other informs us
that “Haider Quli Khan, during whose period tyranny has become extinct,
laid waste several idol temples in order to make this strong building firm…”
(1933-34, Pp. 37-44).
Literary evidence
of Islamic iconoclasm vis-a-vis Hindu places of worship is far more extensive.
It covers a longer span of time, from the fifth decade of the 7th century
to the closing years of the eighteenth. It also embraces a larger
space, from Transoxiana in the north to Tamil Nadu in the south, and from
Afghanistan in the west to Assam in the east. Marxist “historians”
and Muslim apologists would have us believe that medieval Muslim annalists
were indulging in poetic exaggerations in order to please their pious patrons.
Archaeological explorations in modern times have, however, provided physical
proofs of literary descriptions. The vast cradle of Hindu culture
is literally littered with ruins of temples and monasteries belonging to
all sects of Sanatana Dharma - Buddhist, Jain, Saiva, Shakta, Vaishnava
and the rest.
Almost all medieval
Muslim historians credit their heroes with desecration of Hindu idols and/or
destruction of Hindu temples. The picture that emerges has the following
components, depending upon whether the iconoclast was in a hurry on account
of Hindu resistance or did his work at leisure after a decisive victory:
1. The idols were
mutilated or smashed or burnt or melted down if they were made of precious
metals.
2. Sculptures
in relief on walls and pillars were disfigured or scraped away or torn
down.
3. Idols of stone
and inferior metals or their pieces were taken away, sometimes by cartloads,
to be thrown down before the main mosque in (a) the metropolis of the ruling
Muslim sultan and (b) the holy cities of Islam, particularly Mecca, Medina
and Baghdad.
4. There were
instances of idols being turned into lavatory seats or handed over to butchers
to be used as weights while selling meat.
5. Brahmin priests
and other holy men in and around the temple were molested or murdered.
6. Sacred vessels
and scriptures used in worship were defiled and scattered or burnt.
7. Temples were
damaged or despoiled or demolished or burnt down or converted into mosques
with some structural alterations or entire mosques were raised on the same
sites mostly with temple materials.
8. Cows were slaughtered
on the temple sites so that Hindus could not use them again.
The literary sources,
like epigraphic, provide evidence of the elation which Muslims felt while
witnessing or narrating these “pious deeds.” A few citations from Amir
Khusru will illustrate the point. The instances cited relate to the doings
of Jalalud-Din Firuz Khalji, Alaud-Din Khalji and the letter’s military
commanders. Khusru served as a court-poet of sex successive sultans at
Delhi and wrote a masnavi in praise of each. He was the dearest
disciple of Shaikh Nizamud-Din Awliya and has come to be honoured as some
sort of a sufi himself. In our own times, he is being hailed is the
father of a composite Hindu-Muslim culture and the pioneer of secularism.
Dr. R. C. Majumdar, whom the Marxists malign as a “communalist historian”
names him as a “liberal Muslim”.
1. Jhain:
“Next morning he (Jalalud-Din) went again to the temples and ordered their
destruction… While the soldiers sought every opportunity of plundering,
the Shah was engaged in burning the temples and destroying the idols.
There were two bronze idols of Brahma, each of which weighed more than
a thousand mans. These were broken into pieces and the fragments
were distributed among the officers, with orders to throw them down at
the gates of the Masjid on their return (to Delhi)” (Miftah-ul-Futuh).
2. Devagiri:
“He (Alaud-Din) destroyed the temples of the idolaters and erected pulpits
and arches for mosques” (Ibid.).
3. Somanath:
“They made the temple prostrate itself towards the Kaaba. You may
say that the temple first offered its prayers and then had a bath (i.e.
the temple was made to topple and fall into the sea)… He (Ulugh Khan) destroyed
all the idols and temples, but sent one idol, the biggest of all idols,
to the court of his Godlike Majesty and on that account in that ancient
stronghold of idolatry, the summons to prayers was proclaimed so loudly
that they heard it in Misr (Egypt) and Madain (Iraq)” (Tarikh-i-Alai).
4. Delhi:
“He (Alaud-Din) ordered the circumference of the new minar to be made double
of the old one (Qutb Minar)… The stones were dug out from the hills and
the temples of the infidels were demolished to furnish a supply” (Ibid.).
5. Ranthambhor:
“This strong fort was taken by the slaughter of the stinking Rai.
Jhain was also captured, an iron fort, an ancient abode of idolatry, and
a new city of the people of the faith arose. The temple of Bahir
(Bhairava) Deo and temples of other gods, were all razed to the ground”
(Ibid.).
6. Brahmastpuri
(Chidambaram): “Here he (Malik Kafur) heard that in Bramastpuri there
was a golden idol… He then determined on razing the temple to the ground…
It was the holy place of the Hindus which the Malik dug up from its foundations
with the greatest care, and the heads of brahmans and idolaters danced
from their necks and fell to the ground at their feet, and blood flowed
in torrents. The stone idols called Ling Mahadeo, which had been
established a long time at the place and on which the women of the infidels
rubbed their vaginas for (sexual) satisfaction, these, up to this time,
the kick of the horse of Islam had not attempted to break. The Musulmans
destroyed in the lings and Deo Narain fell down, and other gods
who had fixed their seats there raised feet and jumped so high that at
one leap they reached the fort of Lanka, and in that affright the lings
themselves would have fled had they had any legs to stand on” (Ibid).
7. Madura:
“They found the city empty for the Rai had fled with the Ranis, but had
left two or three hundred elephants in the temple of Jagnar (Jagannatha).
The elephants were captured and the temple burnt” (Ibid.).
8. Fatan: (Pattan):
“There was another rai in these parts …a Brahmin named Pandya Guru… his
capital was Fatan, where there was a temple with an idol in it laden with
jewels. The rai fled when the army of the Sultan arrived at Fatan…
They then struck the idol with an iron hatchet, and opened its head.
Although it was the very Qibla of the accursed infidels, it kissed the
earth and filled the holy treasury” (Ashiqa).
9. Ma’bar:
(Parts of South India): “On the right hand and on the left hand the army
has conquered from sea to sea, and several capitals of the gods of the
Hindus, in which Satanism has prevailed since the time of the Jinns, have
been demolished. All these impurities of infidelity have been cleansed
by the Sultan’s destruction of idol-temples, beginning with his first holy
expedition to Deogir, so that the flames of the light of the Law (of Islam)
illumine all these unholy countries, and places for the criers of prayers
are exalted on high, and prayers are read in mosques. Allah be praised!”
(Tarikh-i-Alai).
The story of how
Islamic invaders sought to destroy the very foundations of Hindu society
and culture is long and extremely painful. It would certainly be
better for everybody to forget the past, but for the prescriptions of Islamic
theology which remain intact and make it obligatory for believers to destroy
idols and idol temples.
No comments:
Post a Comment