WE THE PEOPLE
Conquest of India says nothing of any
natural superiority on the part of conquerors, but it is due to lack of
character and indiscipline in Indians, who were subjected by exploiting the
spirits with division and jealousies between fellow citizens. It is difficult
and impossible to conquer a Nation having intelligent approach, different
religions and language form its invaders. Spain could not be able to conquer.
Dutch province with their petty population remained unfallable. The same is the
glory with Switzerland and Greeks in old ages. Israel and Vietnam are the
recent examples of solidarity. India on the other hand was conquered by an Army
consisting of its own inhabitants and a small fraction of 1/5th Army
at the average of these invaders. Thus India can hardly be said to had been
conquered at all by the foreign invaders, she was rather conquered herself. The
truth is that there is no India in political and scarcely in any other sense.
It is a Geographical expression. The invaders had subjugated and abrogated the
resource of this country due to its weakness. They have adopted the policy of
“Divide and Rule”.
Alexander invaded the country and defeated
King Porus with the help of Indian rulers. Since the time of rise of Mahmood
Ghazni a steady of invasion has poured in India. The tie of Nationality has now
been broken resulting the integrity and jeopardise the national disrespect
towards the existing system which our politicians have borrowed in succession
from the wake of partition. British’s have derived a system based on two Nation
theory, but Mr. Nehru in order to gain the political superiority had accepted
the same and be fooled the Nation blaming Mr. Jinnah who was actually aspirant
to get the electorate representation of Muslims in proportionate on theory of
Fundamental principle that we are all citizens and equal rights to them be
given to rule the Nation. The objective to attain freedom and to remove social
evil in the society fermented hatred and discord through communal politics. The
freedom has become tainted with a permanent gulf between Hindus and Muslims.
The feeling of love peace and harmony in the name of God and religions has
ultimate outcome of sudden and radical change which has diversified effect and
impact on religious fenaims of Muslims and Hindus. The political game of
British’s has succeeded in high pitch of communal frenzy. The fate of real
victims has been forgotten. Now the communal hatred, madness and barbarism had
its free hand both in Pakistan and in India.
We fought the battle against the crusaders
of independents like Neta ji Subhash Chandra Bose who sacrificed his life for
independence. He was subjected to humiliations even after electing as president
of National Congress after defeating Gandhi ji in 1939 due to nefarious
planning of aspirant politicians to ruin the Nation. Churchill has
characterised Indians as primitive due to such disgraceful anti National
feelings. The historical change in the process of accession of Nation by the
British’s was due to such shameful characteristics of the opportunists. Since
the time of acquiring power by Bahadur Shah Zafar in 1837, the British’s have
always recognised him as their emperor from the time of Lord Aukland upto the
period of George Allenbro, but Lord Hasting then Governor General had diverted
from maintaining such Traditional resumplance of his Majesty and Dynasty and
wrote a confidential letter to his Ambassador Metkaph stating that the emperor
Grace and his authenticity command has now vanished and the grace of Emperor
which embraces the proud of identifying him with Taimur dynasty is on more in
existence. The gifts which were offered to commander in chief by the Governor
General are no more required to moulded with identity and title of the emperor.
The Governor General is no more required to pose as the servant of the king and
now there is nothing to require in order to represent Governor General as
Subordinate to the Emperor. This historical change was not witnessed in a
single day which was in the process of accession of Nation from the shameful
defeat of Nawab Shahzadulla in the battle of plassey from Clive in the year of
1757.
Let us remember 12 June 1757, when British
Army collided with Chandra Nagar Army and leaving behind only 150 British
soldiers at Chandra Nagar, Clive with an Army of 650 English soldiers, 150
Artillery, 50 Navy and 2100 Indian soldiers on the invitation of Traitor Meer
Zafar. He marched to Morsidabad to fight against an army consisting of more
than one Lak (1,00.000) soldiers of Nawab Shahzadullah. There was a long
distance from Calcutta to Morsidabad. In between Hoogly and Kotaya were the
strong fortress under the domination of Nawab but Hoogly had surrendered
voluntarily, while in Kotaya Clive had not only succeeded by victory, but also
with a huge stock of rice which of one year. Meer Zafar, Sadar Wazir of Nawab
on being assured to become Emperor, for which Jagat Seth Amirchand was given
bribe of Rs 30 Laks, who had collided with commanders namely Ram Durlabh and
Yar Lateef in conspiracy to give this Banquest of flower with victory to clive
in the battle on 21st June 1757, Clive received the invitation from
Meer Zafar to invade the Army of one Lak soldiers with only 3,000 soldiers, in
which patriot Meer Madan fought a fearless battle on 23 June 1757, but he was
injured and withdrawn. Maharaja Mohan Lal who fought with the troops upto the
deciding hour of victory, was withdrawn on persuation of Meer Zafar. Meer Madan
had informed Nawab Shahzadullah in respect of conspiracy of Meer Zafar, has put
his crown on his feet and persuaded by administering oath in the name of Allah
not to betrayal during the struggle, after withdrawing Maharaja Mohan Lal from
battle field, Zafar conveyed the message to clive to attack at Midnight and
ultimately Nawab Shahzadullah ran away from battle field of plassey to
Morsidabed and Meer Zafar having 45,000 soldiers surrendered before the Clive.
This was the reason of calling the Indians as cowardice, selfish and primitive
by the Churchill at the wake of Independence and partition of India.
We are 15% of world population and having
1.5% of world’s income. We are 54% of all illiterate of the world. In 1950 we
were ranking at 16th place in the list of exporting countries, now
we are ranked at 45th place. In 1950 we had 2.2% of export of world
market today we stand at 0.45%. The population of Hong Kong is 0.7% and its
land is 0.03% of India yet it has almost three times the trade of India. India
has less than half of one percent of world’s tourist traffic. North has 1/4th
of world’s population and it has 70% of wealth and 80% of trade. It has 90% of
Industry, 99% of finest and most advanced centres of learning and technology.
In North, the total weight of their mile power which is surplus as one million
ton while the butter is 1.5 million tons. There is 20 million tons of surplus
fedo . Our political set up regenerates the corruption to prevent the benefit
of donations received through begging and other aids from trackling down the
requirement of down trocdens. Since all aid goes into the private pocket of yes
men of politician as such North has now stopped all such assistance which they
virtually find as surplus in their countries. It is interesting that
politicians ask another country to finance the corruption in their own statel.
We are still like a cavemen with our backs
turn to light watching the shadow on the wall. The politicians have imposed
mindless socialism which held in thrall the people endeavour and enterprise
resulting in transfer of potential from the honest bonavelent to the dishonest
and foreign ambitions. Politicians acts in nefacarious designs with impunity.
Political parties motivated with vested interests are dancing to usurp power
through any means fair or foul even at the cost of sacrificing the Nation’s
existence to personal interest. Party systems has pushed to advance its own
schemes upon the ruin of the rest. Our politicians are mafia dons next to the
invaders. Robbers have generally plundered the rich who are seldom subjected to
punishment but the politicians having the will of our regislation always
plunget the common citizens and protect those mafia dons under the phraseology
of “law making sovereign power” having the connotation “procedure establish
under law to be cherished instead of due process”. There is always and excuse
for tyranny and maladministration which has degenerated the national character.
The power given need a safeguard from such arbtitrary power and unfair
exercise. In present set up freedom has become an abuse and liberty as license.
Therefore the moral damage is more terrible. Abn oppressive system is more to
be teared than a Tiger.
Mr Chandra Shekhar, then Prime Minister who
also held charge of Home Ministry himself, transferred Shri N.K. Singh then
joint director of C.B.I. who was conducting inverstigation into st. Kitt’s
forgery committed by controversial mafia don Chanaraswami when he refused to
drop the investigation. The transfer, which was manifestly for killing the
investigation was challenged before central administration Tribunal. The
tribunal pronounced that a civil servant however highly placed is bound to
implement the policy decisions and directives given by the minister concerned.
It was observed that a posture in public by a civil servant by showing his
disagreement with the directions given by minister concered is untenable in an
constitutional scheme, under which the minister concerned is accountable and
answerable to their ministers. The tribunal declared :- “The concept of
indispensaility of and individual officer, however upright, honest and efficient
he may be, is unknown to good administration under any legal system. A civil
servant trying to uphold the public and preserve and protect public interest
against the decision and directions of his own minister who are the political
maters, is also alien to our legal system”.
No comments:
Post a Comment