For many years the international community has heard very little about Israel’s historical and legal rights

Religion is certainly a matter of faith with individuals or communities and it is not necessarily theistic.  There are well known religions in India like Budhism and Jainism which do not believe in God or in any Intelligent First Cause.  A religion undoubtedly has its basis in a system of beliefs or doctrines which are regarded by those who profess that religion as conducive to their spiritual well being, but it would not be correct to say that religion is nothing else but a doctrine or belief.  A religion may not only lay down a code of ethical rules for its followers to accept, it might prescribe rituals and observances, ceremonies and modes of worship which are regarded as integral parts of religion, and these forms and observances might extend even to matters of food and dress

The above-mentioned constitutional goal has to be kept in view by the Minorities Commissions set up at the Central or State levels. Commissions set up for minorities have to direct their activities to maintain integrity and unity of India by gradually eliminating the minority  and majority classes. It, only on the basis of a different religious thought or less numerical strength or lack of health, wealth, education, power or social rights, a claim of a section of Indian society to the status of minority is considered and conceded, there would be no end to such claims in a society as multi-religious and multi-linguistic as India is. A claim by one group of citizens would lead to a similar claim by another group of citizens and conflict and strife would ensue. As such, the Hindu society being based on caste, is itself divided into various minority groups. Each caste claims to be separate from the other. In a caste-ridden Indian society,  no section or distinct group of people can claim to be in majority. All are minorities amongst Hindus.  Many of them claim such status because of their small number and expect protection from the State on the ground that they are backward. If each minority group feels afraid of the other group, an atmosphere of mutual fear and distrust would be created posing serious threat to the integrity of our Nation. That would sow seeds of multi-nationalism in India. It is, therefore, necessary that Minority Commission should act in a manner so as to prevent generating feelings of multinationalism in various sections of people of Bharat."

 The expression 'minority' has been used in Article 29 and 30 of the Constitution but it has nowhere been defined. The Preamble of the Constitution proclaims to guarantee every citizen 'liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship'. Group of Articles 25 to 30 guarantee protection of religious, cultural and educational rights to both majority and minority communities. It appears that keeping in view the constitutional guarantee for protection of cultural, educational and religious rights of all citizens, it was not felt necessary to define 'minority'. Minority as understood from constitutional scheme signifies an identifiable group of people or community who were seen as deserving protection from likely deprivation of their rights by other communities who happen to be in majority and likely to grain political power in a democratic form of Government based on election. 

Do You know any thing about the courage, determinations, diversity in unity, gourde and spirit  of pride in saving their temple from invaders of Greeks, Roman Catholics, Muslims by the JEWISH ZIONIST ASPIRATIONS. The Histotrical Journey through Archeological Arts of Solomon's Temple , the truth behind BLACK STONE AT MECCA, And Occupations of TAJ MAHAL previously Known as TEJO JI MAHALIVIYA, A JAT GOOJER TEMPLE PALACE BUILT BY RAJA PARAMINIDEV is very much similar, but the HINDUS having their superstitions, Orthodox attitudes towards the invaders Onslaught up on their close inhibitions are not so dynamic as to expose the Falsehood of Islamic Invasions. We need FREEDOM FOR ALL PEOPLE AND THEIR FAITH FROM MUSLIMS IMPOSTERS/ The Patriarchs started some where between 1700 BCE to 1651 BCE when Davit Built the FIRST TEMPLE after declaring it City of DAVID in 1002 BCE and starting point of this temple may be some where round about 940BCE. . But it was soon broken in 549 Bce. and remain under Bobylolonian Captivity up to 515 BCE. An ancient BOBYLONIAN CHRONICLE recording the Capture of Juresaleman on 16th March 598 BCE. The Second Temple was built in 510 - 505 BCE. . there was cyrus cylinder in 599 - 530 BCE, which permitted the rebuilding of TEMPLE. . The GREEK conquests in 325 BCE and Maccabecan revolt in 151 BCE are significant. There has been HASMONCANS COIN having inscription of 135 -104 BCE. Yahohanan the High Priest and Comeil of the JEWS is present on this Coin. It is very significant to trace the remains of their Historical truth. The roman Empire in 60 BCE . The HERO DION a fortress and Palace built by HEROD 7.5 Mi From JERUSALEMAN. the HEROD 62 CE -29BCE. is crucial period. The great Revolt of 70 101 to 70 CE , then BARKOKHBA REVOLT in 314 CE -132 CE . The TONE with Hebrew inscription to the TRUMPELTING place believed to be a part of second temple. The Bronze Statute of Roman Emperor HADRIANUS found in tel  SHALEM. . In 326 Roman became Christian in 328 CE. It was in 711 CE that Muslims conquest started in absence of unity in religious pre dominance. See more on www. Jcpa.org

 Than started the Crusader conquest in 1100CE.

 For many years the international community has heard very little about Israel’s historical and legal rights in the Arab-Israel con­flict. What was axiomatic in the days of Abba Eban and Chaim Herzog came to be forgotten. To correct this, the Jerusalem Center, in partnership with the World Jewish Congress, issued a comprehensive study prepared by leading historians and legal experts. The book was edited by Ambassador Alan Baker and presented at an international conference held in Jerusalem on November 19, 2011. Vice Prime Minister Lt.-Gen. (ret.) Moshe “Bogie” Yaalon, who spoke at the conference, reiterated the importance of recognizing Israel as a nation-state of the Jewish people. Since 2000 there has been a concerted effort by Pal­estinian leaders to deny the Jewish historical connec­tion to Jerusalem. This narrative has even penetrated leading opinion-makers in academia and the inter­national media. As part of an effort to address this problem, the Jerusalem Center produced a YouTube video which compressed 4000 years of Jerusalem’s history into a five-minute presentation. This video received nearly 200,000 views in English and Hebrew since its release on May 30, 2011.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose govern­ment has been described as “neo-Ottoman” in outlook, told the Saudi newspaper al-Watan (March 7, 2010) that the Cave of the Patriarchs and Rachel’s Tomb “were not and never will be Jewish sites, but Islamic sites.”

Yet Erdogan’s statement contradicts a nineteenth century firman (imperial decree) issued by the Ottoman Empire rec­ognizing Jewish rights at Rachel’s Tomb according to Nadav Shragai, a senior researcher at the Jerusalem Center.

The firman, which was issued in 1827, gave legal force to the Jewish presumption of ownership at the site. Addition­ally, the governor of Damascus sent a written order to the Mufti of Jerusalem to fulfill the Ottoman Sultan’s order.

UNESCO’s decision to refer to Rachel’s Tomb also as the “Bilal ibn Rabah Mosque” has no historical basis in the Ottoman documents.