concept of Al-Takkeya, it is legitimate for Muslims to lie, cheat, murder, deceive and violate non-Muslims.

Under the Islamic concept of Al-Takkeya, it is legitimate for Muslims to  lie, cheat, murder, deceive and violate non-Muslims. According to Takkeya,  Muslims are sanctioned to communicate with fake  incerity. In reality, they  may have just the opposite agenda in their hearts. It is clear that Islam  permits Muslims to lie anytime, anywhere to promote the cause of Islam.  Can we trust Muslims and their paid agents? It is a known Islamic practice,  that when Muslims are under pressure, they can agree with most anything.  Once they become strong, then they negate what they formally agreed to  non-believers.  The concept of Al-Takeyya (lying) for the cause of Islam bears gross  implications for freedom loving, law abiding non-Muslims. Muslims can negate  any agreement, cheat, deceive, lie, and absolve from any permanent  commitment. When a Muslim say "Islam is peace" watch out. When a Muslim  shout "Allah loves you" he mean "Allah hates you" unless you are a Muslim.  Unlike most religions, within Islam, there are certain passages under which  lying not simply tolerated, but actually encouraged. In the book "The  Spirit  of Islam," by the Muslim scholar, AFIF A. TABBART states (page 247) "lying  is more profitable and better for the general welfare, and for the  settlement and conciliation among people, than telling the truth".  Muslim military dictators, Jihadi and their paid agents think that Islam  would exempt them  Spiritual accountability if they lie as a foundation for a  strategic Islamic maneuver. There are many incidences in the life of  Mohammed where he often lied and instructed his followers to do the same. A  good example is the assassination of Kaab Ibn Ashrf, a member of the Jewish  tribe, Banu al-Nudair.  Mohammed ordered his assassination by deception,  lying and tricks. Mohammed also ordered the  urder of Shaalan by deception  and lying. Islamic history is replete with incidents of murder and  assassination by deception.  Muslims are familiar with the deceptive life of Mohammed, his lying and  looting. Muslims and their paid agents will justify lying in situations  where Muslims sense the need to do so.  The present Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Jihadi terrorism in Kashmir, the  Philippines and Bosnia cannot be detached from Islamic theology. The Jihadi  behavior depend on what they think upon their concept of reality. One  complicating fact is that reality is far from being the same for Muslims,  for the reason that their conception is based on Islamic theology. For  Muslims, experience of reality depend on the Islamic culture and historical  factors. Islamic perception of reality is not objective. It is selective and  contingent upon their Islamic vision. It is illogical on our part to negate  the Islamic vision, and their goal of establishing Dar ul-Islam.  Muslims and their cohorts have never seriously reflected on the problems of  reality as such. They are willing to regroup, come again with Islamic fervor  and fight. Islamic terrorism throughout the world will continue, whenever  Muslims have the opportunity. Peace treaties with infidel nations mean  nothing for Muslims until they conquer non-Islamic nations and convert the  entire infidel population.  Jihadi violence in Gaza, Kashmir, Chechnya, Sudan, Somalia, Nigeria, the  Philippines, Afghanistan and Pakistan have still been instigated by hardcore  Islamic Mullahs. They consider infidel world is the major obstacle to their  goal of conquering the world for Allah. The Islamic society around the world  supports Jihadis with an all-consuming passion.  A careful analysis of Islamic terrorism and Jihadi violence in the Middle  East and elsewhere clearly shows the causes of Jihadi terrorism came not  from Israel, India or the US. Divisive, closed and dogmatic Islamic theology  plays an important role in spreading the conflict.  Islamic paid agents, mindless liberals and phony secularists who are  joining with Jihadis are also part of the problem. They play an equally  important part in sustaining and promoting Jihadi terrorism. They have an  interest in prolonging conflict and crisis. Can this happen anywhere, except in a HINDU NATION - BHARAT?That the distress of Mahatma Gandhi on the wake of partition of Indian continent may still be heard from a distant voice calling to the people to unite and the unity in diversities may provide India's survival as a nation before partition which depends on a wider vision of unity based on inter-dependence based on the sub continents and secularism and social justice. Let us try to hear again how distressed Mahatma ji was at the turn of events on the  wake of partition: " So far it was my desire to live upto the age of one hundred and  twenty five years, but now I have no such desire. The objective before me was not just to attain freedom, but also to remove all the  social ills in the society which had pestered during the 200 years of the British Rule. They have practically divested us of our traditions of tolerance and harmony and instead fomented hatred and discord through their communal policies . I had thought that we could change the entire system and the people of this country and would live together as brothers in love, harmony and peace, so that coming generations may be blessed with all of that , which we have been deprived of. Therefore in addition to the freedom of my country , the primary objective of my life was maintenance of cordial relations between Hindus and Muslims since I could not attain my objective , this freedom has become tainted .Today when I see Hindus and Muslims separated with more or less permanent gulf , I feel politically and spiritually defeated . I have no desire to live any longer …….when I cannot remove this mutual hatred and ill will between Hindus and Muslims , and cannot create feeling of love peace and harmony in name of God and religion , you tell whether there is any point in my living any more ? I would prefer death to this kind of life." That "Partition of India" was purely a political game fought with a mark of religious fundamentalism the speech of Quaid Azam Zinnah on 11-08-1947 who vehemently advocated the two nation theory was enunciated the Government of Pakistan policy has also realised the folly committed in accepting partition on communal lines in these words:  "If you change your past and work together in spirit that every one of you , no matter what community he belongs to, no matter  what his colour , caste or creed , is first , second and last , a citizen of this state with equal rights, privileges and obligation  there will be no end to the progress you will make. I cannot emphasise it too much ; we should begin to work in that spirit , and in course of time , all these angularities , of the majority and minority communities, the Hindu community and the Muslim community , because even as regards Muslims, you have Pathans, Punjabis, Shias , Sunnis, and so on and among the Hindus you have Brahmins , Vaishnavas, Khatris also Bengalis Madrasi's and so on , will vanish. You may go to your temples, Mosques or any religion or caste or creed, that has nothing to do with the business of the state …….We are starting with the fundamental principle that we all citizens and equal citizens of one State…." That Let us examine the factors responsible for the partition of India , certain extra-ordinary emotional circumstances in the event of quick succession rushed through a very disparate speed which caught in the whirl wind having a sort of commutative effect on our  national life. The operation of the system of working of two political parties that is Indian congress and Muslim league and lack of collective wisdom in the leaders of both the political party had ultimately resulted into the partition of Indian continent . Gandihiji observed after the partition ,when the congress leaders  had virtually buried him a life , Gandhiji gave the said spirited reply:- " I cling to the hope that I am not yet buried alive. The hope rests on the belief that massed have not lost faith in my ideals . When  it is proved that they have, they will be lost and I can then be  said to have been buried alive. But as long as my faith burns bright, as I hope it will even if stands alone ,I shall alive in the grave, and what is more , speaking from it. The life is worthless which ignores or disregards moral values." That with the demand for local self government the tempo of national movement gain movement gain momentum , thus the government of India act 1909 Known as Morely Minto Act was passed by the parliament of England. Then came the first world war 1914 in which the people of India forgetting all differences , co-operated  in anticipation of self government and Home rule after the war . This was done on the basis of pronouncement in parliament on 20th August 1917 regarding assurance as per policy of British government  for granting responsible government by providing for the increasing association of Indians cocuy branch of Indian administration and for gradual development of self governing institution with a vision to progressive realisation of responsible government in India as an integral part of British empire and there after quit of India. Act  1919 was passed by the parliament.That the governor general issue ordinance which were to have the free of law for six months. The Indian people had expected much more and men co-operation , civil discipline disobedience movements and terrorist activities started . Inspired communal riots insisted the necessity to send statutory commission popularity knew as Simon commission for England in 1927 to study the problems which was boycotted by Indian national congress. The Cmmission submitted its report vehemently condemning diarchy which was discussed at round Table conference led to the government of India Act !935. Sir Stafford Cripps made negations with the acceptance that the elected body of Indians should frame the Indian constitution and for the purpose cabinet mission was send to assist the viceroy in setting up the constitution and to mediate between the congress and Muslim league.That Government of India Act 1935 has provided separate electorate and communal representation in the central and provincial legislature. To strengthen hands of all India Muslim league that critical stage in 1945 , British Government had decided to hold general election both for central legislative assembly and provincial legislature under the government of India Act 1935. In that high pitch of communal frenzy, the result was foregone conclusion.