Thursday, May 2, 2013

Stefano- Manio Nexus of most cruel dynastic Succressors GIVEN FREE HAND MUSLIMS AS PER SHERIAT LAW ?after Nadir Shah Mohd. Shah Rangeela


Stefano- Manio Nexus of most cruel dynastic Succressos. The last crucial target selected by this family may be the Robert Vadehra , as his entire family meet to the mysterious death one after another and Nehru Manio Family Nexus ruling this Nation from Italian Rulers will Not Allow to Take the Loin Income of rs  5, 000/ - Carores Earned by  Scrapped Goad can not easily Spared to be enjoyed by this agent having free access and outgoes to every Air port without ant security check up.  The way in which our Government is acting regarding the Commonwealth Games reminds me of the story of Mohd. Shah Rangeela.  When Nadir Shah was attacking India and his forces had come to Peshawar, the Intelligence people of Mohd. Shah Rangeela, the Mughal emperor informed him of the same.  Mohd. Shah Rangeela stated that Nadir Shah is far away and nothing needs to be done.  When Nadir Shah reached Lahore, Mohd. Shah Rangeela was informed of the same but the latter stated that the former's forces were far away and nothing needs to be done.  Meanwhile Mohd. Shah Rangeela continued to enjoy dance and other such things.  When Nadir Shah reached Panipat, Mohd. Shah Rangeela was again informed of the same but it evoked the same response from him.  When Nadir Shah reached the outskirts of Delhi, it did not effect Mohd. Shah Rangeela much and he continued to enjoy with his dance girls and prostitutes.  When Nadir Shah reached the outer limits of Red Fort, only then Mohd. Shah Rangeela woke up to the reality and ordered his forces to be ready but then it was too late.  Our Prime Minister has similarly woken up  too late. Why 'no’ why ‘NOT’ is uniform civil code anti-secular? i also think that caste system should be made illegal to practice under the uniform civil code.. shouldn't it? Is this Indian Government really protecting India???? BE A PUBLIC TRIAL and women in THE HOME OF VICTIM BE GIVEN FREE HAND MUSLIMS AS PER SHERIAT LAW ? Why should not the Corrupt & inefficient courts be replaced? Ladies, Patriots & all citizens, Please email to the P M, C J I, President of India, H M, Law Minister etc. to print the Gazette Notifications TO DEAL WITH ACCUSED. PROPERTY BE CONFISCATED TO COMPENSATE CRIME.    MUSLIMS WOMAN ARE TERRIFIED IN THEIR HOME. MADANI IS A FRAUD AND ACTUAL POWER IS  TASMILA NASHREEN  AND DEOBAND IN MUMBAI. I SUGGEST THAT MUSLIMS EXPOSE THE FRAUD OF BEING GOVERNED BY FRAUD AND MISCONCEPTIONS OF KILLING HINDUS AS HINDUS NEVER AFFRAID OF SUCH MOHHAMMAD PHOBIA WHO DOES NOT IDENTIFY THAT A GIRL OF 9 YEARS AYISA MAYNOT BE SEDUCED BY A MAN OF 46 year t, to whom you call devine and spiritual. SATOP RUTHLESS KILLING as NATRE WILL TAKE REVENGE FROM THE MUSLIMS WORLD. SAUDI PEOPLE UNEARTH THE GRAVES OF MOHHAMAD FATIMA, KHADIZA,IN 1804 -9 WHY YOU ARE MAKING THEM GRAVE YARDS. MUSLIMS STARTED PROSTITUTION. . It’s also strange that gang-rape of this girl is being projected as awakening of this nation but it’s really baffling to understand what exactly are we trying to say when we say so? Are we trying to say that had this girl been not gang-raped we would have never awakened? That’s why I feel this huge protest is orchestrated or it’s totally redundant. That I say so since Delhi has already attained the infamous title of being “rape capital of the country’” long back ago. There were 568 cases of rape, registered in 2007-2011 period. So was Delhi and whole nation sleeping? The Times of India news report from where I picked this data, quoting a police official, stated: ”Former IPS officer Y P Singh said the police informally classify rape into two categories: technical and violent. ‘In case of technical rapes, there is an element of consent involved and there is no violence. Some examples are a lady caught red-handed in an act and then alleging rape; a man inducing a lady with a false promise of marriage and having intercourse. There have also been cases where departmental seniors have called for wives of suspended juniors to stop the husband being dismissed from service,”   7.1 Jury trial – For quick, fair judgements : The trial of rape must be decided by Jury of 25 randomly chosen citizens, between 30 years and 55 years, of the district in which crime was committed. The Jury will be formed by an officer titled as District Jury Administrator who will be appointed by High Court Chief judge and can be recalled\replaced by citizen-voters of that district. (Procedure-draft in chapter 21,http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm ). 7.2 Narco Test in Public : To prove or disprove whether rape was committed, narco tests on rape accused should be conducted in public after Jury has seen reasonable incriminating evidences.  1. All rape cases will be tried by Jury and Jury only. The Jury will consists of 25 citizens between 30 years and 55 years of age chosen at random from the district, and at least 13 will be women.  2. If the accused himself wants or if 13 out of 25 Jurors deem necessary to have truth serum test on the accused, then the investigating officer will conduct truth serum test on the accused.   3. If complainer wants, then and then only, then the investigating officers will conduct truth serum test on the complainer. The complainer will not be asked to take truth serum test against her will unless 13 out of 25 jurors demand narco test. 7.3. (Procedure-draft in chapter 22 ,http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm 7.4 Right to Recall Lower Court, High Court and Supreme Court judges in-charge of crimes against women : Every district must have 3 judges in-charge of crimes against women, and women of district should have right to recall them. Same at High Court and Supreme Court levels. (Procedure-draft in chapter 7,http://rahulmehta.com/301.htm  Bharat needs Panch Parmeshwar/ Jury System, as adapted from our Vedas, by USA, Canada, Singapore, Japan, UK & European countries. It shall take more than one year to finish the trial in Indian British Colonial Court Systems, in the latest notorious Delhi Bus Gang Rape case, even if it is taken up on daily basis, as calculated & declared on certain Hindi TV channels on 2 Jan 13, by eminent S C Advocate Sardar Tulsi Ji. I am sure that the same justice can be delivered within 1 week, by our new Jury System in courts. We do not want another court case like Kasab or Arushi Murder cases, settling in ages. Instruments of oppression – institutional corruption
1.Legal System –By the promulgation of the Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence developed after the Magna-Carta in 1211 AD within the British parliament, one has to understand the growth of legal system started much before the period of British system of governance which is based upon no written law. One has to introspect the legal system at the time of Changez Khan who said that legal system is regulated by strength of the ruler. There was the dictum of the sovereignty vested with the ruler and the legal system was dependent upon the will of the ruler. After the arrival of the logic and perception thereof by the philosophers starting from the time of Plato and Aristotle, which was based upon the vedic traditions of universal applications of transquality amongst the fellow citizens based upon vasudeva kutumbkam, the imparting of justice to the individual seeking protection under the judicial system was predominant. Roman catholics started their existence on the basis of power intoxication and all such norms which were based upon ethical foundation, had undergone a vital change in the philosophy of the legal system by generating the feeling of the supremacy vested with the power of the religion, one has to accept the dictum of the empire. Soon after the birth of Jesus Christ the theory of fagunun based upon the pardon of the criminal after execution of the crime as it was considered that the victim is not supposed to recovered from the heinous crime then why the State having the governance may adopt the role of doing another crime by the theory of punishment. These principles were gradually eclipsed according to the desire of the individual having an authority to control the judicial system which was initially vested with the ruler of the nation. The community of the witness Joseph denounced the concept of nationhood by saying that the citizens of a particular state is a citizen of the world and as such the control of the sovereignty inflicted by the ruler of the nation of the nation will not be accepted for imparting the justice to the litigant. The Doctrine of Litigant rights are supreme and the redressal of the grievances of the affected party is the paramount consideration. Upto this period the ruler of the nation was deciding the cases and only some lucky people subjected to the exploitation were having the access to the justice as the doors of justice were not usually open to the downtrodden society whose fate and welfare was dependent upon the choice of the individual having predomination in the society. Thus, under the Islamic perception of the Legal system, since Maulavi and other religious leaders became an authority to impart the justice to the victim, the judgment of one Maulavi for the same offence was distinguishable on the basis of the ethical approach and soon the people have started realizing that there is the imposition of the will of the judge adjudicating the cause is of much prominence than nay ethical foundation on the basis of which the justice be administered to an individual. The Magna Cart acme to the existence having universal application of its application and the system of the appointment of the judges for imparting justice came into existence only thereafter. Initially the freedom of expression was under the subordination of the sovereignty and nobody was permissible to speak anything derogatory to the existence of the nation and the ruler ruling the nation. However after the charter of freedom of liberty and the statute created in 1644 by Washington, the liberty of individual expression based upon his conscience has taken over the role of predomination and the criticism against the sovereign power became a protected right to the citizens.
 That the legal system based upon four theories of punishment had undergone a vital change and the concept of deterrent punishment in which the criminal may realize that the crime is the bad bargain started from the time of Manu had undergone in the theory of retribution punishment by the expansion of the Islamic domination. Two other theories of preventive detention and the reformative system to the criminals were started under the British domination and without disclosing why the preventive detention is done, the state government has taken the plea that the prevention of the crime is more important and as such the reason for detention is within the realm of the sovereignty and no individual may question the authority of such detention. Under the parliamentarian democratic system of governance of legal system where the parliament acts as Lord Brahma, bureaucrats as Lord Vishnu and Judicial institution system as Lord Shiva having the separation of power had undergone a deflection under the power of the Governor who have been given their right not to sanction the prosecution of the public officer and the State Government may withdraw the prosecution as per the will of the Chief Minister after being imparted in the form of the advice of the Cabinet to the Governor and under section 321  CRPC, the State government became empowered to withdraw prosecution. In this manner after undergoing a vital change in the legal system of governance the theory of the sovereignty as the instrument of oppression in the Anglo Saxon jurisprudence in the legal system can still be glorified under the parliamentarian democratic republican system having control under our constitution and the exploitation of the citizen under the guise of imparting justice can very well be seen when Law and Justice are inimical and are not having the talking terms within the fore corner of our judicial system and the exploitation of the litigant in the system of hierarchy by his advocate and the advocate is being exploited by the individual whims of the judge , and the judge is remained under hierarchical command and ultimately the representative of the people may control the concept of the sovereignty is the law of the nation.

No comments:

Post a Comment