List of such States where Hindus were reduced to minority after independence of India

As the entire material on record relating to population immediately after enforcement of of Constitution in 1951 is available on record, it is necessary to look into the matter.Census Report of 1951 makes it clear that total population of India at that time was 35 crores 68 lacs out of which Hindus consisted about 30 crores 67 lacs, Sikhs were 68 lacs, Jains were 16 lacks, Budhists 2 lacs, Zoroastrian 1 lac Christians 82 lacs, Muslims 3 crores 54 lacs, Other Religion Returns (Tribal)-17 lacs and Other Religion Return (Non-Tribal) - 1 lac.  The population of Hindu at that time was about 85%, Sikhs 1.74%, Jains .45%, Buddhist-.6%,  Zoroastrian- 1%, Christians 2.3%, Muslims 9%, Other Religion Returns (Tribal)-.47 and Other Religion Return (Non-Tribal) - .3%.  The total population of undivided India in 1941 was 31 crores 41 lacs out of which Muslim at that time constituted 3 crores 96 lacks, i.e., 12.5.% excluding Jammu & Kashmir.  In 1951, the total population of India at that time was 35,68,79,394 out of which population of Uttar Pradesh was 6,32,15, 942.
Controversy relates to Uttar Pradesh in 1951 & 2001 total population of Hindus and Muslims in the State of Uttar Pradesh was as under:-
               1951                                                  2001
Total 63215742                                         Total 166197921
Religion Male Female            Hindu-133979283    
Sikhs 1,10,947 86,665            Muslim- 3,7440158
Jains   51,651 46,063            
Buddhists   1,968  1,253            
Zoroastrian       678     580            
Muslims          9058982  
Christians       64,799     59,083      
Jews     33     1
Hindu            53760925
The demographic changes on the basis of 2001 Census.  Out of total population  of India of 1,028,610,328 at present Muslims population was 13,81,88,240, Sikhs are 1,92,15,730, Christians are 2,40,80,016, Buddhists are 79,55,207 and  Jains are 42,25,053.  List of such States where Hindus were reduced to minority after independence of India is as under:-
State Total Population   Hindus
Jammu and Kashmir 1,014,3700 30,05,349    
Arunachal Pradesh 1,097,968 3,79,936        
Nagaland        19,90,036 1,53,162        
Manipur 21,66,788 9,96,894
Mizoram  8,88,573   31,562                    
Meghalaya 23,18,822 3,07,822                  
Lakshadweep      60,650       2,281    
Punjab 2,43,58,999  8997942
As matter relates to religious minority, argument  of 50% of the total population presupposes two groups, i.e., above 50% and less than 50%.  In a multi religious society how this 50% would be calculated and which religious group could be recognised as religious minority group in comparison to which religious group will be considered in succeeding part of the judgment.  

Relevant paragraph at page 42 of the Book 'Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India

Relevant paragraph at page 42 of the   Book 'Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India (Vol. III: Medieval Indian Society and Culture) by J.L. Mehta is also relevant, the same is being quoted below:-
"Thus, Islam does not separate religion from politics; in fact, the concept of religion in Islam emerged first, the state was 'an after-thought'.  The additional Islamic law does not acknowledge 'the independent existence of state, nor is state regarded as a primary condition of human society.  It makes the State completely subservient to the religion of the Prophet.  According to the Islamic law, the state is only an instrument to serve the creed in the attainment of its objectives or fulfilment of ideals of the muslim brotherhood.  The Islamic theory of state was, therefore, based on a three fold idea of one scripture, one sovereign and one nation; scriptu was the hly Quran, sovereign was the imam (leader), also called Khalifa (the caliph)- political successor to the Prophet, and nation was the millat-the muslim brotherhood.  The basic feature of the state, according to this theory, was its 'indivisibility'  in all the three aspects.  It contemplated the establishment of a theocratic state based on the Islamic law, and recommended only one sovereign, the caliph, to rule over the whole of the muslim world.  The caliph was styled as the amir ul momnin-'the leader of the faithful'; his office was thus a political institution based on Islamic injunctions.  The sovereignty resided in the millat which elected their imam or the caliph, and the latter was under religious obligation to implement the Islamic law on and for the benefit of his muslim subjects.  The Islamic government was, therefore, one which was composed of the muslims, by the muslims and existed for the happiness and welfare of the muslims alone."
This paragraph has references of Books such as Arnol J Toynbee, A Study of History: 12 vols; OUP, 4th impression, 1948, IV, p. 230, Wolseley Haig, CHI,III, p.-10, A.B.M. Habibullah, Foundation of Muslim Rule in India; Allahabad, 2nd ed; 1961, p.2., Toynbee, Study of History, pp.clt; VI, p. 285,  Toynbee, Study of History, pp.clt; IV, p. 98,  Toynbee, Study of History, pp.clt; VI, pp.98-100,  Toynbee, Study of History, pp.clt; VI, p.5,129, 131-132, 245-60.

The percentage of different religion groups considered by the Constituent Assembly for minorities  were in three Groups, i.e., Group A- less than 1/2%, Group B- less than 1-1/2% and Group C- above 1-1/2%.  Muslims at that   time were  above      1-1/2%.  The Constituent Assembly fixed criteria for above 1-1/2% which may be interpreted as not more than 2% otherwise Constituent Assembly may have mentioned it less than 5%, but Constituent Assembly considered only above 1-1/2% in the Schedule which was adopted by the Constituent Assembly for recognising a religious community as minority.  It is worthy to notice here that Constituent Assembly was constituted before partition of the country. It was expected at the time of partition of India on the basis of two nations theory that most of Muslim population, which led agitation for dividing the country in united India (as is clear from Constituent Assembly Debates) would go to Pakistan and only a small group of such nationalist Muslims who supported Congress and opposed partition would remain in India and appropriate protection was required to be given to such Muslims only. Protection to minority in the Constitution  was given to different religious groups, i.e.,  Anglo Indians and Christians who were attached with the Britishers as dominant religious groups and after leaving Britishers from India being an insignificant group in the matter of population and were not in a position to affect democratic process were protected in the matter of religion, culture and educational institutions, though Christians in some States are now a major dominant religious force and also affects the democratic process such as North Eastern States, Kerala and some other States.  Similarly, Parsees who were small in number were also provided protection in regard to religion and culture etc. in view of the fact that they were not in a position to affect/dominate politics in India.  Sikhs were also given protection of minority as India was partitioned and lakhs of Sikhs lost their lives and some migrated from Pakistan to India and they constituted population at that time less than 1-1/2 per cent. But so far as Muslims are concerned, the assessment was that the total population of Muslims who would not leave India would be slightly above 1-1/2 percent as is clear from the Schedule prepared by the Advisory Committee on Minority headed by Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel adopted by Constituent Assembly. Had the Constituent Assembly visualised this fact that after partition of India and after exchange of Hindu and Muslim population, substantial population of such Muslims who led agitation in different parts of India for partition of the country and divided the country would remain in India even after partition of the country and major part of Muslims population would not migrate to Pakistan, the Constituent Assembly would not have  fixed the criteria mentioned above.  That is why Constituent Assembly had fixed 1-1/2% criteria otherwise it would have fixed 5% or 10%.As held by the Apex Court in T.M.A. Foundation(supra) case that the provision of special rights to minorities was introduced to remove their sense of insecurity and lack of confidence, the provision of minority was not intended to create any privilege to any section of the society in the name of  minority institutions over and above rights of majority group (other than Muslims). It was to remove inequality vis-a-vis other communities and that is why 1-1/2% was fixed so far as Indian Muslims who   adopted   Indian citizenship after partition  as    Indians    are    concerned.      As stated above, Schedule prepared by the Advisory Committee on Minority was accepted by the Constituent Assembly which mentioned population of Muslims above 1-1/2% after partition and thus it was made the basis for determining religious minority of Muslims under Constitution.  

Historical Back Ground of Invaders Muslim in India

Historical Back Ground of Invaders Muslim in India

Muslim community started claiming as religious minority only just before independence.  Islam came in India in 712 A.D. through foreign invaders.  First  invasion was made by Mohd. Bin Qasim and thereafter a series of invasions were made by Mohd. Gajni and Mohd. Gori etc.  Mohd. Bin Qasim established Islamic Rule in Sindh and Multan in 712 A.D.  After Mohd. Gori, Mohd. Qutubbuddin Aibak, Akram Shah, Altmus, Gyasuddin Blaban, Razia Sultan, Jalaluddin Khilji, Alauddin Khilji, Firoz Shah Tughlak, IbrahimmLodhi and other Sultans ruled India and thereafter Babar established Moghul rule in 1526 followed  Humaun, Akbar, Jahangir, Shahjahan, Aurangjeb and other Moghul rulers and lastly by Bahadur Shah Zafar in greater India.  Indian society other than Muslim minority was ruled by Muslim Rulers for about one thousand years over most parts of India.   For all these years Indian society other than Muslim minority was subjected to pay Jezia Tax in most parts of India to remain as Hindus and to perform their cultural and religious rites.
Relevant Paragraphs at page 50 of a  Book 'Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India (Vol. III: Medieval Indian Society and Culture) by J.L. Mehta is relevant in the present context, the same is being reproduced below:-
"Mohd. Bin Qasim, who laid the foundation of the Muslim Rule in Sindh and Multan (711-12), secured the status of Zimmis for his hindu subjects from the caliph and accorded protection to their lives and property on the receipt of jaziya.  Obviously, this step was necessitated as a matter of political expediency because in spite of the loss of independence, the hindu masses, in general offered odgged resistence to forced conversions.  It was physically impossible for Qasim and handful of his Arab followers to compel the vanquished multitude 'to choose between Islam and death', particularly, when they were 'armed to the teeth'.  Recognition of hindu 'idolators' of Arabia.  His example was followed by the turkaofghan rulers of Delhi in their dealings with the hindus.  The latter were not treated as full-fledged citizens of 'the Islamic stte' albeit they received status of zimmis-'the second-class' or 'inferior'  citizens, which denied them all political rights and made them suffer from certain socio=religious and economic disabilities so as 'to prevent them from growing strong.  In the words of Jadu Nath Sarkar,
"The very term zimmi is an insulting title.  It connotes political inferiority and helplessness like the status of a minor proprietor, perpetually under a guardian; such protected people could not claim equality with the citizens of the Muslim theocracy."
There developed, with the passage of time, four schools of though for the authoritative interpretation of shara or 'the Islamic law'; these were known as Malakite, Shafite, Hanbalite and Hanafite after the names of their founders-Malik Ibn Anas (715-95 A.D.), Ash-Shafi (767-820), Ahmad Bin Hanbal (780-855) and Abu Hanifah (699-766), Doctors of the first three schools offered no other alternative but death to 'the idolators' including the hindus, on their refusal to embrace Islam.  It were the exponents of the Hanifah school alone who permitted their existence in the Islamic state as zimmis.  That explains the intesne hatred of the non-muslims by the orthodox muslims fanatics, in general; whenever a muslim ruler fell under the spell of such orthodox ulema, he adopted the policy of religious intolerance and persecution of his hindu subjects.  It created a permanent gulf between the hindus and muslims which could not be bridged effectively for a long time.  According to an observation, 'the politcal and religious condition under which the hindus were forced to live in a muslim state raised a great barrier between the two communities.  The political supremacy of muslims was absolute; the hindus not only enjoyed no political status in practice, but could not even aspire to it under Islamic theory'.  While living in their own country and in possession of their own hearths and homes, the hindus were reduced to the status of inferior citizens of 'an Islamic state' as the sultanate of Delhi was usually styled.  On the other hand, the muslims, though in microscopic minority, constituted the privileged or the most favoured children of the state who enjoyed the bounties and benefited from all the public welfare and other state enterprises."

TAJ MAHAL previously Known as TEJO JI MAHALIVIYA, A JAT GOOJER TEMPLE PALACE BUILT BY RAJA PARAMINIDEV

Do You know any thing about the courage, determinations, diversity in unity, gourde and spirit  of pride in saving their temple from invaders of Greeks, Roman Catholics, Muslims by the JEWISH ZIONIST ASPIRATIONS. The Histotrical Journey through Archeological Arts of Solomon's Temple , the truth behind BLACK STONE AT MECCA, And Occupations of TAJ MAHAL previously Known as TEJO JI MAHALIVIYA, A JAT GOOJER TEMPLE PALACE BUILT BY RAJA PARAMINIDEV is very much similar, but the HINDUS having their superstitions, Orthodox attitudes towards the invaders Onslaught up on their close inhibitions are not so dynamic as to expose the Falsehood of Islamic Invasions. We need FREEDOM FOR ALL PEOPLE AND THEIR FAITH FROM MUSLIMS IMPOSTERS/ The Patriarchs started some where between 1700 BCE to 1651 BCE when Davit Built the FIRST TEMPLE after declaring it City of DAVID in 1002 BCE and starting point of this temple may be some where round about 940BCE. . But it was soon broken in 549 Bce. and remain under Bobylolonian Captivity up to 515 BCE. An ancient BOBYLONIAN CHRONICLE recording the Capture of Juresaleman on 16th March 598 BCE. The Second Temple was built in 510 - 505 BCE. . there was cyrus cylinder in 599 - 530 BCE, which permitted the rebuilding of TEMPLE. . The GREEK conquests in 325 BCE and Maccabecan revolt in 151 BCE are significant. There has been HASMONCANS COIN having inscription of 135 -104 BCE. Yahohanan the High Priest and Comeil of the JEWS is present on this Coin. It is very significant to trace the remains of their Historical truth. The roman Empire in 60 BCE . The HERO DION a fortress and Palace built by HEROD 7.5 Mi From JERUSALEMAN. the HEROD 62 CE -29BCE. is crucial period. The great Revolt of 70 101 to 70 CE , then BARKOKHBA REVOLT in 314 CE -132 CE . The TONE with Hebrew inscription to the TRUMPELTING place believed to be a part of second temple. The Bronze Statute of Roman Emperor HADRIANUS found in tel  SHALEM. . In 326 Roman became Christian in 328 CE. It was in 711 CE that Muslims conquest started in absence of unity in religious pre dominance. Search  www.jcpa.org

MUSLIM AZAN AND EXISTENCE OF INNOCENT CITIZEN ARYANS

vFk ekuo /keZ osn mokp% vkse~ HkwReStkj.ke HkwR;S Loue~& osn

    ltx dk dY;k.k gksrk gS vltx &izeknh dk fouk’k

lko/kku! ;g vtku ys ysxh tku AA v/k;Zvk;Z ujs’k

                                oSfnd eos”kd mn~xh;

nks jk”V~ ds lw= dk mn~?kks”k djds vaxzstkas ds }kjk ukbZ xbZ eqfye yhx ds eap ls Þ lkjs tgka ls vPNk fgUnqLrku gekjk Þ xhr xkus okys bdoky s  1930 ds vklek ls ikfdLrku dks ekx dh A Þvtkuß ds okrfod vFkZ dks u le> dj yk[kks fgUnw uksvk[kyh Hkksiyk caxy o vkke esa xktj ewyh ugha dqRrksa dh ekSr ekjs x,A mudh yk’kksa ds gh ugha vfirq muds vtUes xHZkLFk cPpksa dks Hh ekrkvksa ds xHkZ dkV&dkV dkSvksa rFkk dqRrks dks f[kyk fn, x,A ;fn ns’k Hkj ds fgUnw ml le; Hkh vk;Z lekt¼lR;k ls LFkkiu ik[k.M fuokj.k lHkk ½ds jpf;rk nso n;kn ds lR; izdk’k  ds 14os ldqYykl dks i< dj lko/kku gks tkrs rks ,slh nqxkfrZ u gksrhA [ksn dh turk us lR; ij inkZ Mky dj rq”Vhdj.k dk jksy [ksyus okys xka/kh usg: dh ckr ekudj dkfryks dks viuh HkkbZ ekuk ijUrq lR; izdk’kd thou nkrk  n;kuUn dks fo”k fiyk;kA yk[kksa efUnjksa dks rksM dj cukbZ xbZ efLtnksa ls nks Kku okyh vtku dHkh vk;Z [kkylk fgUnw gsrq dY;k.k dkjh dSl gks ldrh gS usrkvks us vkt dh rjg r Hkh fgUnw turk dks lc Hzkfer fd;k  lc /keZ vPN gSa lc /keksZ dks ekuus okys vPNs gSA fgUnw &eqfLye HkkbZ&HkkbZ ls usrkvksa us turk dks Hkzfer fd;k fgUnwvksa usrk eqlyekuksa dks HkkbZ le>k ijUrq mUgksus dqjvku dh vk;r 1 lwjk60dk ikyu djrs fgUnwvksa dks HkkbZ u le>dj dkjwj le>kA dqjvku dh vusd vk;rksa esa Li”V fy[kk gS fd tks lkros vkdk’k ds Njksa ‘kjkc dh ufn;ksa yksMksZ vkSj mlds xSax dks ekjus okys dqjvku o mlds mins’kd eqgEen lkgc ij fo’okl ugha djrk og dfQj gSA

      /keZ ds uke ij nh tkus okyh ÞvtkuÞvkSj mlds I’pkr gksus okyh ßuektß esa D;k dgk x;k gS bls tku dj gh vk;Z [kkylk fgUnw ;g le> ldsaxs fd oLrqr% blls lko/kku gksus dh D;ksa vko’;pdrk gS nso n;kn vkSj ml d fuHkhZd vk;sZins’kd efLtnksa d   ls 7 vklekuks vYykg eqgEen ;k mldh xksgR;k ij=h ywVus ij /ku ywVus pkj vkSjra djus okyh  dqjvku dks u ekuus okyksa dks dkfQj le>dj n.M nss dks fo/kk djrh gSA vkxs vtku dks ns[ksa& g;&; vyLlykg A¼nks ckj½vkvks uekt dh vskjA g;&; vyky QykgA ¼nks ckj½ vksvks Qyrk o dY;k.k dh vksj A ÞxSjks ij ;q) esa lQyrk rFkk muds ywV ds eky ls dY;k.k gsrq D;kjh vkxs &vYykg vdcj& ¼nks ckj ½ vYykg gh egku gSA yk byk&g bYyYykg& vYykg dks NksM nwljksa dksbZ Hkxoku egku ugha A vLlyky [ks:fEeyu &ukSeA ¼nks ckj½ uekt uhan ls vPNh gSA bls ;g Li”V flag gks x;k fd c  O;kid bZ’oj ds ekuus okyksa d izfr [kyk fonzksg gSa tks k[ksnk dks u ------------------

vFk fo’o osn /keZ mok& vkse vXus es/kk foua dq: Lokgk & gs O;kid bZ’oj gesa es/kkoh djs ft les/kk ls tkxzr nso tuksa us ik[k.Mksa dks gVkdj /kjrh dks LoxZ cuk;k og gesa feys

¿yk[ksak vukMh uekt dks lekt &/keZ ekuus ls fcuk ekSr ekjs x,À

              vkpk;Z vk;Zujs’k mn~xh’k

vKku]tkfr] /ku] dks/k rFkk dqlhZ ds yksHk esa osn&/keZ ls nwj gks dj vl[; vk;Z[kkylk fgUnw eqfLye uekt etgc dks Hkh /keZ eku dj e`R;q ds f’kdkj gq,A vtku }kjk kuekt gsrq ,df-r gq, eqlyeku D;k izkFkZuk djrs gS\ D;k eqlyekuksa dh uekth bcknr /kjrh s yksxksa ls ;kj vkSj midkj gsrq gS\ ;fn vtku vkSj uekt iw.kZ i`Foh ds ekuokas gsrq dY;k.k dkjh gksrh rks Hkkjr lafgr lalkj Hkj ds eqlyeku ;gwnh bZlkbZ] vus gh eqfLye HkkbZ f’k;kvksa vgefn;ksa o vl[; fgUnwvksa dk dRy u rks djrs ,oa u gh vc dj jgs gksrsA dgrs gS fd pksj ]Mkdw cnek’k igys nljksa dks ywVrs ,oa xyk dkVrs gSa ijrq nwljksa ds lkFk&lkFk vkxs py dj viuksa dk Hkh xyk dkVus yxrs gSA tSs fd vkt dy ikfdLrku ]bjkd bjku vkSj vQxkfuLrku esa f’k;k rFkk lqUh ,d nwljs dk gh xyk dkV jgs gSA xkWa/kh th us dqjvku dks iuk pkfg, fd lHkh vU; eqyeku Hkh vki ij n;k djsaxsA ;fn ,slk gksrk rks vkt Hkh ikfdLrku ds fons’kh eqlyeku vkSj vius gh ns’k ds d’ehjh eqlyeku o gh jgus okys vk;Z [kkylksa dk dRy u djrs ,oa yxHakx ikWp yk[kfgUnqvksa dks d’ehj ls ckgj u fudkyrsA lpkbZ dks tkuus dk iz;kl djsa -----n;kuUn ds lR;kFkZ izdk’k ds 14osa leq0 dks i

      dqjvku esa nwljksa ij n;k djs ,oa nwljksa dk izldkj djs dh ckr rks cgqr nwj gS vkvks eqyekuksa }kjk izfrfnu ikWp ckj c  lqCgk &u dYyk gqe &e o fc gefn & d o rck&j dLeq&d o r vkyk tnnq&do k byA&g xS:&dk 7 o vklekuh vYykg rw efgekoku gSA iz’kaKk rsjs gh fy, gSA rsjk uke ’kqHk vkSj eaydkjh gSA rjh ‘kku loksZPp gSA rsjs flok dksbZ vU; iwT; ugha gSA vFkkZr eqlyekuksa ds lkrosa vklekuh vYykg ds flok dksbZ ntk ugha tks vYykg dks NksM fdlh nwljs dks ekus og dkfQj gS ,oa dRy ds ;ksX; gSA dqjvku lwjk 8 vk;r 12&17 rFkk lwjk 9 vk;r 5]111 vkfn A Þvmt fcYykfg feuj ‘kSrkfuZjthe ß vFkZ%& eS nqrdkjs gq, ‘kSrku ls cus ds fy, vYykg dh ‘kj.k esa vkrk gWA /;ku esa j[ks fd eqlyeku yksx :g o vyykg ds lkFk&lkFk Þ’kSrkuß vkSj ftUu dks Hkh ekurs gSA fdt dh mifLFkfr dHkh Hkh fl) u fd, tkus ls ,d xk; gSA vk’p;Z pfdr djus dh ckr  rks ;g gS fd dqjvku ‘kjhQ esa ,d bcyhl uke ds ‘kSrku dh ppkZ gS tks bruk rkdroj vkSj LoNUn gS fd vYykg dks Hkh ltnk ¼lyke½ ugha djrk rFkk vYykg bru detksj gS fd mldk Hkh dqN ugha fcxkM ldkA tc 7 ok vklekuh vYykg vius ,d ‘k=q vFkok fojks/kh dk gh dqN ugha fcxkM ldrk rks og dqjvku dh xkIiksa esa u tkus D;ksa bruk rkdroj of.kZr gS\ D;k ek= xSjksa dks Mlj eqlyeku cukus gsrq bl ls ;g fl) gksrk gS fd dqjvku esa eqlyeku u cus ij nkst[k ¼ujd½ LFkku fo’ks”k tks fd foKku dh n`f”V ls tUur ds leku gh dksjk >wB gSa es vkx es tykus 5rsy Mkyus] [kky [khapus vkfn dh ckarsa djuk dsoy xIi gSA ekk= Mjk dj /keZ ifjorZu djus dk “kM;U= gSA vk’p;Z bl ckr dk gS fd vkt ds ;qx esa eqlyeku bXthfu;j ]MkDVj o cSKkfud gksrs gq, Hkh dSls bu diksy &dfYir xIiksa ij fo’ok djds ftgknhdj ns’k nzksgh cu jgs gSA vkt rd fdlh jk”V~ ds cSKkfudksa dks uklk lfgr vkdk’k esa dskbZ vYykg ;k tUur ugha feyhAdkfQj le>dj eqlyekuksa }kjk dqjvku lwjk 8 vk;r 12 ls 17 o dwjk dh 5o 11 vk;r ds vuqlkj dRy ds ;ksX; gS vr% vtku ls lko/kku A

a

Bharatkalyan97: Beauty of the confluences of rivers

Bharatkalyan97: Beauty of the confluences of rivers: 1. Confluence of the Rhone and Arve Rivers in Geneva, Switzerland 2. Confluence of the Ilz, Danube, and Inn Rivers in Passau, Germany ...